Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg

HIGHFix: ultrajson/ultrajson@82af1d0

GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-401 vulnerability in ujson. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

UltraJSON has a Memory Leak in ujson.dump() on Write Failure

Also known asCVE-2026-44660PYSEC-2026-2293
Published
May 12, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs35th percentile — riskier than 35% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.31%0.61%0.92%0.0%0.4%0.4%0.4%Jun 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 356,665 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍ujson

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

When ujson.dump() writes to a file-like object and the write operation raises an exception, the serialized JSON string object is not decremented, leaking memory. Each failed write operation leaks the full size of the serialized payload.

Code that uses ujson.dumps() rather than ujson.dump() or only JSON load/decode methods is unaffected.

Details

Vulnerability Location:

  • src/ujson/python/objToJSON.c:913 - objToJSONFile() function start
  • src/ujson/python/objToJSON.c:931 - Error return on write failure
  • src/ujson/python/objToJSON.c:942 - Early return without cleanup

Root Cause:

The objToJSONFile() function allocates a Python string object via ujson_dumps_internal(), calls the file's write() method, and returns early if write() raises an exception—but never calls Py_DECREF(string) on the early exit path.

PoC

import gc, tracemalloc, ujson

class BadFile:
    def write(self, s):
        raise RuntimeError("boom")

obj = {"x": "A" * 200000}

def run():
    try:
        ujson.dump(obj, BadFile())
    except RuntimeError:
        pass

run()
tracemalloc.start()
gc.collect()
base = tracemalloc.get_traced_memory()[0]

for i in range(5):
    run()
    gc.collect()
    cur = tracemalloc.get_traced_memory()[0]
    print(i, cur - base)

Impact

Any application that serializes data through ujson.dump() to an attacker-influenced file-like object that can fail can be driven into linear memory growth. An attacker can quickly use up all the memory of say a web server that sends JSON responses using ujson.dump() by repeatedly making requests then closing the connection mid response.

Remediation

The missing dec-refs were added in 82af1d0ac01d09aa40c887b460d44b9d9f4bccd9. We recommend upgrading to UltraJSON 5.12.1.

Workarounds

Replacing ujson.dump(obj, file) with file.write(ujson.dumps(obj)) is equivalent (contrary to popular misconception, there are no streaming benefits to using ujson.dump()) and will avoid the memory leak.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIujsonall versions5.12.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ujson. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update ujson to 5.12.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

This Moderate flaw in UltraJSON can lead to a denial of service due to a memory leak when `ujson.dump()` attempts to write to a file-like object and encounters an exception. Applications utilizing `ujson.dump()` with attacker-controlled input or file-like objects are susceptible to resource exhaustion. Deployments…

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary When `ujson.dump()` writes to a file-like object and the write operation raises an exception, the serialized JSON string object is not decremented, leaking memory. Each failed write operation leaks the full size of the serialized payload. Code that uses `ujson.dumps()` rather than `ujson.dump()` or only JSON load/decode methods is unaffected. ### Details **Vulnerability Location:** - `src/ujson/python/objToJSON.c:913` - `objToJSONFile()` function start - `src/ujson/python/objToJSON.c:931` - Error return on write failure - `src/ujson/python/objToJSON.c:942` - Early return withou
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-c38f-wx89-p2xg: ujson Information… | O3 Security