GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h — @apollo/server
Fix: apollographql/apollo-server@ada1200GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h is a security vulnerability in @apollo/server. A fix is available for @apollo/server — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Apollo Server: Browser bug allows for bypass of XS-Search (read-only Cross-Site Request Forgery) prevention
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@apollo/servernpmapollo-server-corenpmDescription
Impact
In a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack, untrusted web content causes browsers to send authenticated requests to web servers which use cookies for authentication. While the web content is prevented from reading the request's response due to the Cross-Origin Request Sharing (CORS) protocol, an attacker may be able to cause side effects in the server ("CSRF" attack), or learn something about the response via timing analysis ("XS-Search" attack).
Apollo Server has a built-in feature which prevents CSRF and XS-Search attacks: it refuses to process GraphQL requests that could possibly have been sent by a spec-compliant web browser without a protective "preflight" step. See Apollo Server's docs for more details on CORS, CSRF attacks, and Apollo Server's CSRF prevention feature.
This feature is fully effective against attacks carried out against users of spec-compliant browsers. Unfortunately, a major browser introduced a bug in 2025 which meant in certain cases, it failed to follow the CORS spec. The browser's maintainers have already committed to fixing the bug and making the browser spec-compliant again.
Even with this bug, Apollo Server's CSRF prevention feature blocks "side effect" CSRF attacks: Apollo Server will still correctly refuse to execute mutations in requests that were not preflighted. However, some specially crafted authenticated GraphQL queries can be issued across origins without preflight in buggy versions of this browser, allowing for XS-Search attacks: an attacker can analyze response times to learn facts about the responses to requests such as whether fields return null or approximately how many list entries are returned from fields.
GraphQL servers are only vulnerable if they rely on cookies (or HTTP Basic Auth) for authentication.
Patches
The vulnerability is patched in @apollo/server v5.5.0. This release contains a single change: GraphQL requests sent in HTTP GET requests which contain a Content-Type header naming a type other than application/json are rejected. (GET requests with no Content-Type are allowed.) This change prevents XS-Search attacks even in browsers which are non-compliant in ways similar to this browser.
There are no known cases where GraphQL apps depend on the ability of clients to send non-empty Content-Type headers with GET requests other than application/json, so this change has not been made configurable; if this change breaks a use case, file an issue and more configurability can be added.
Apollo is not currently providing a patch for previous major versions of Apollo Server, which are all end-of-life.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not possible, this particular browser's bug can be mitigated by preventing any HTTP request with a Content-Type header containing message/ from reaching Apollo Server (e.g. in a proxy or middleware).
For example, when using Apollo Server's Express integration, something like this can be placed before attaching expressMiddleware to the app:
app.use((req, res, next) => {
for (let i = 0; i < req.rawHeaders.length - 1; i += 2) {
if (
req.rawHeaders[i].toLowerCase() === 'content-type' &&
req.rawHeaders[i + 1].includes('message/')
) {
return res.status(415).json({ error: 'Content-Type not allowed' });
}
}
next();
});
While the patch prevents a broader class of similar issues, the only known way to exploit this vulnerability is against a particular browser which currently plans to ship a fix in May 2026. If it is already past June 2026 and this vulnerability has not been addressed yet, it is likely that the system is not currently vulnerable. Upgrading to the latest version of Apollo Server is still recommended for the broader protection.
Resources
The browser bug causes a similar vulnerability in Apollo Router; see https://github.com/apollographql/router/security/advisories/GHSA-hff2-gcpx-8f4p
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @apollo/server | all versions | 5.5.0npm install @apollo/server@5.5.0 |
| 📦npm | apollo-server-core | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @apollo/server, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @apollo/server to 5.5.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-9q82-xgwf-vj6h across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.