Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2g

xml-crypto Vulnerable to XML Signature Verification Bypass via Multiple SignedInfo References

Also known asCVE-2025-29774
Published
Mar 14, 2025
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
1 known

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
9.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk95th percentile+8.58%
0.00%3.91%7.82%11.7%0.1%9.0%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

3 pkgs affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

xml-cryptonpm
3.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

An attacker may be able to exploit this vulnerability to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms in systems that rely on xml-crypto for verifying signed XML documents. The vulnerability allows an attacker to modify a valid signed XML message in a way that still passes signature verification checks. For example, it could be used to alter critical identity or access control attributes, enabling an attacker with a valid account to escalate privileges or impersonate another user.

Patches

All versions <= 6.0.0 are affected. Please upgrade to version 6.0.1.

If you are still using v2.x or v3.x please upgrade to the associated patch version.

Indicators of Compromise

When logging XML payloads, check for the following indicators. If the payload includes encrypted elements, ensure you analyze the decrypted version for a complete assessment. (If encryption is not used, analyze the original XML document directly). This applies to various XML-based authentication and authorization flows, such as SAML Response payloads.

Multiple SignedInfo Nodes

There should not be more than one SignedInfo node inside a Signature. If you find multiple SignedInfo nodes, it could indicate an attack.

<Signature>
    <SomeNode>
      <SignedInfo>
        <Reference URI="somefakereference">
          <DigestValue>forgeddigestvalue</DigestValue>
        </Reference>
      </SignedInfo>
    </SomeNode>
    <SignedInfo>
        <Reference URI="realsignedreference">
          <DigestValue>realdigestvalue</DigestValue>
        </Reference>
      </SignedInfo>
    </SignedInfo>
</Signature>

Code to test

Pass in the decrypted version of the document

decryptedDocument = ... // yours to implement

// This check is per-Signature node, not per-document
const signedInfoNodes = xpath.select(".//*[local-name(.)='SignedInfo']", signatureNode);

if (signedInfoNodes.length === 0) {
  // Not necessarily a compromise, but invalid. Should contain exactly one SignedInfo node
  // Yours to implement
}

if (signedInfoNodes.length > 1) {
  // Compromise detected, yours to implement
}

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmxml-crypto4.0.0&&< 6.0.16.0.1
📦npmxml-crypto3.0.0&&< 3.2.13.2.1
📦npmxml-cryptoall versions2.1.6
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for xml-crypto. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update xml-crypto to 6.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2g is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2g. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# Impact An attacker may be able to exploit this vulnerability to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms in systems that rely on xml-crypto for verifying signed XML documents. The vulnerability allows an attacker to modify a valid signed XML message in a way that still passes signature verification checks. For example, it could be used to alter critical identity or access control attributes, enabling an attacker with a valid account to escalate privileges or impersonate another user. # Patches All versions <= 6.0.0 are affected. Please upgrade to version 6.0.1. If you are still us
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2g in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2g across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.