How severe is GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp?

GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp affects the following packages: bagisto/bagisto (Packagist). Ecosystems affected: Packagist.

How do I fix GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp?

Update bagisto/bagisto to 2.3.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp in my Packagist dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bagisto/bagisto. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

How do I mitigate GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp?

O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Is GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp?

GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 1.2%, placing it in the 65th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp?

GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp is classified as CWE-1336 (CWE-1336). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp was published on January 2, 2026 and was last updated on February 3, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp: bagisto/bagisto Remote Code Execution

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

1.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk65th percentile+0.61%

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected

🐘bagisto/bagisto

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

SSTI is possible in Bagisto via type parameter can lead to RCE and other exploitations.

Details

Go to http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/reporting/products/view?type={{7*7}}

Impact

Can lead to RCE, command injection.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐘Packagist	`bagisto/bagisto`	all versions	2.3.10

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bagisto/bagisto. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update bagisto/bagisto to 2.3.10 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary SSTI is possible in Bagisto via type parameter can lead to RCE and other exploitations. ### Details 1. Go to `http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/reporting/products/view?type={{7*7}}` <img width="1251" height="282" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/652e96f4-631e-4322-8561-63f4d897a480" /> ### Impact Can lead to RCE, command injection.

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works

GHSA-9hvg-qw5q-wqwp