Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Withdrawn — this advisory has been retracted
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj

GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj is a CWE-1321 vulnerability in rpyc. 2 public exploit references exist, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Duplicate Advisory: Possible remote code execution via a remote procedure call

Also known asCVE-2019-16328GHSA-pj4g-4488-wmxmPYSEC-2019-118
Published
Nov 20, 2019
Updated
Dec 6, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
2 known
Exploitation data as of Dec 6, 2024 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍rpyc

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Withdrawn: duplicate of GHSA-pj4g-4488-wmxm

Original Description

In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIrpyc4.1.0&&< 4.1.24.1.2
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rpyc. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update rpyc to 4.1.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Withdrawn: duplicate of GHSA-pj4g-4488-wmxm ## Original Description In RPyC 4.1.x through 4.1.1, a remote attacker can dynamically modify object attributes to construct a remote procedure call that executes code for an RPyC service with default configuration settings.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-9ggp-4jpr-7ppj: rpyc | O3 Security