How severe is GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj?

GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj affects the following packages: aiohttp (PyPI). Ecosystems affected: PyPI.

How do I fix GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj?

Update aiohttp to 3.12.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj in my PyPI dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aiohttp, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

How does O3 Security protect against GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj?

O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Is GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj?

GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.3%, placing it in the 24th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj?

GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj is classified as CWE-444 (CWE-444). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation.

When was GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj was published on July 14, 2025 and was last updated on September 10, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

🐍 PyPI

Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj — aiohttp

Fix: aio-libs/aiohttp@e8d774f

GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj is a CWE-444 vulnerability in aiohttp. A fix is available for aiohttp — see the affected versions and patch details below.

AIOHTTP is vulnerable to HTTP Request/Response Smuggling through incorrect parsing of chunked trailer sections

Also known asCVE-2025-53643PYSEC-2026-1104

Published

Jul 14, 2025

Updated

Sep 10, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs24th percentile — riskier than 24% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

🐍aiohttp

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The Python parser is vulnerable to a request smuggling vulnerability due to not parsing trailer sections of an HTTP request.

Impact

If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections.

Patch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/e8d774f635dc6d1cd3174d0e38891da5de0e2b6a

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
🐍PyPI	`aiohttp`	all versions	3.12.14`pip install --upgrade 'aiohttp==3.12.14'`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for aiohttp, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update aiohttp to 3.12.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatLow

Product	Fixed in	Advisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8	`automation-controller-0:4.6.25-1.el8ap`	RHSA-2026:1506
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9	`automation-controller-0:4.7.8-1.el9ap`	RHSA-2026:1249
Red Hat Satellite 6.18 for RHEL 9	`python3.12-aiohttp-0:3.13.3-1.el9pc`	RHSA-2026:2760
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6	`ansible-automation-platform-26/ee-supported-rhel9:1772508458`	RHSA-2026:3960
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.22	`rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9:v2.22.3-1763565765`	RHSA-2025:22759
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25	`rhoai/odh-feature-server-rhel9:v2.25.1-1765354568`	RHSA-2025:23531
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0	`openshift-service-mesh/istio-proxyv2-rhel9:1.24.6-1764181669`	RHSA-2025:22939
Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1	`openshift-service-mesh/istio-proxyv2-rhel9:1.26.6-1764332723`	RHSA-2025:22944

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The Python parser is vulnerable to a request smuggling vulnerability due to not parsing trailer sections of an HTTP request. ### Impact If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. ---- Patch: https://github.com/aio-libs/aiohttp/commit/e8d774f635dc6d1cd3174d0e38891da5de0e2b6a

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works