Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3

CRITICALFix: starkbank/ecdsa-python@d136170

GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-347 vulnerability in starkbank-ecdsa. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in starkbank-ecdsa

Also known asCVE-2021-43572PYSEC-2021-426
Published
Nov 10, 2021
Updated
Oct 25, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Oct 25, 2024 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍starkbank-ecdsa

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

The verify function in the Stark Bank Python ECDSA library (starkbank-ecdsa) 2.0.0 fails to check that the signature is non-zero, which allows attackers to forge signatures on arbitrary messages.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIstarkbank-ecdsaall versions2.0.1
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for starkbank-ecdsa. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update starkbank-ecdsa to 2.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

The `verify` function in the Stark Bank Python ECDSA library (starkbank-ecdsa) 2.0.0 fails to check that the signature is non-zero, which allows attackers to forge signatures on arbitrary messages.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3: starkbank-ecdsa… | O3 Security