Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-8wcj-mfrc-jx5q

MEDIUM

Fission builder pods auto-mount the fission-builder ServiceAccount token in the user-supplied builder container

Also known asCVE-2026-50565GO-2026-5850
Published
Jun 30, 2026
Updated
Jul 7, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/fission/fission

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Fission builder pods were created with ServiceAccountName: fission-builder and no AutomountServiceAccountToken: false, so the kubelet auto-mounted the service-account token into every container in the pod — including the user-supplied builder image.

Details

The user controls the builder container image, command, and podspec through Environment.spec.builder.image / .container / .podspec. With the SA token auto-mounted at /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token inside that container, any code running there inherited the fission-builder identity. The fission-builder SA holds namespace-wide get on secrets and configmaps (pkg/utils/serviceaccount.go), so the user-controlled builder container could read every Secret in the builder namespace by name.

This is the buildermgr sibling of GHSA-85g2-pmrx-r49q (CVE-2026-46617), whose fix suppressed the SA-token automount on function runtime pods but did not cover the structurally identical primitive in pkg/buildermgr/envwatcher.go.

Impact

A subject with create/update on Environment CRDs in a namespace observed by the buildermgr could read every Secret and ConfigMap in the builder namespace via the auto-mounted fission-builder token.

Fix

Fixed in #3390 and released in v1.24.0. In createBuilderDeployment:

  • Set pod-level AutomountServiceAccountToken=false on the initial PodSpec and add the projected fetcher SA-token volume.
  • Re-clamp AutomountServiceAccountToken=false after every MergePodSpec call so a user-supplied podspec cannot restore the kubelet automount.
  • Mount the token via a projected volume on the fetcher sidecar only, so the legitimate build → archive-upload flow keeps its cluster API access.

Reuses the projected-volume helpers from pkg/executor/util/satoken.go introduced by the GHSA-85g2-pmrx-r49q fix.

Behavioural change

The user-supplied builder container no longer receives an auto-mounted SA token. The fetcher sidecar still gets its token via a projected volume.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/fission/fissionall versions1.24.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/fission/fission. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/fission/fission to 1.24.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8wcj-mfrc-jx5q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8wcj-mfrc-jx5q is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-8wcj-mfrc-jx5q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Fission builder pods were created with `ServiceAccountName: fission-builder` and no `AutomountServiceAccountToken: false`, so the kubelet auto-mounted the service-account token into every container in the pod — including the user-supplied builder image. ### Details The user controls the builder container image, command, and podspec through `Environment.spec.builder.image` / `.container` / `.podspec`. With the SA token auto-mounted at `/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token` inside that container, any code running there inherited the `fission-builder` identity. The
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8wcj-mfrc-jx5q in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-8wcj-mfrc-jx5q across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.