Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q sliver

HIGHFix: BishopFox/sliver@2d1ea61

GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Broken Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in github.com/bishopfox/sliver. A fix is available for github.com/bishopfox/sliver — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Silver vulnerable to MitM attack against implants due to a cryptography vulnerability

Also known asCVE-2023-34758CVE-2023-35170GO-2023-1866
Published
Jun 21, 2023
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs47th percentile — riskier than 47% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/bishopfox/sliver

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The current cryptography implementation in Sliver up to version 1.5.39 allows a MitM with access to the corresponding implant binary to execute arbitrary codes on implanted devices via intercepted and crafted responses. (Reserved CVE ID: CVE-2023-34758)

Details

Please see the PoC repo.

PoC

Please also see the PoC repo. To setup a simple PoC environment,

  1. Generate an implant with its C2 set to the PoC server's address and copy the embedded private implant key and public server key into the config json.
  2. Run the implant on a separate VM and a notepad.exe window should pop up on the implanted VM.

Impact

A successful attack grants the attacker permission to execute arbitrary code on the implanted device.

References

https://github.com/BishopFox/sliver/blob/master/implant/sliver/cryptography/implant.go
https://github.com/BishopFox/sliver/blob/master/implant/sliver/cryptography/crypto.go
https://github.com/tangent65536/Slivjacker

Credits

Ting-Wei Hsieh from CHT Security Co. Ltd.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/bishopfox/sliver1.5.0&&< 1.5.401.5.40go get github.com/bishopfox/sliver@v1.5.40

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/bishopfox/sliver, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/bishopfox/sliver to 1.5.40 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The current cryptography implementation in Sliver up to version 1.5.39 allows a MitM with access to the corresponding implant binary to execute arbitrary codes on implanted devices via intercepted and crafted responses. (Reserved CVE ID: CVE-2023-34758) ### Details Please see [the PoC repo](https://github.com/tangent65536/Slivjacker). ### PoC Please also see [the PoC repo](https://github.com/tangent65536/Slivjacker). To setup a simple PoC environment, 1. Generate an implant with its C2 set to the PoC server's address and copy the embedded private implant key and public server
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-8jxm-xp43-qh3q: sliver RCE (High 8.1) | O3 Security