Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-8cw6-53m5-4932

MEDIUM

StudioCMS has Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Also known asCVE-2026-24134
Published
Jan 27, 2026
Updated
Feb 3, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk21th percentile+0.24%
0.00%0.27%0.53%0.80%0.0%0.3%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
📦studiocms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

StudioCMS contains a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the Content Management feature that allows users with the "Visitor" role to access draft content created by Editor/Admin/Owner users.

Details

The Issue: The endpoint /dashboard/content-management/edit?edit={UUID} validates user authentication but does NOT validate:

  1. User role (should require Editor/Admin/Owner)
  2. Content ownership (should verify the draft belongs to the user)

This allows users with "Visitor" role (lowest privilege) to access draft content created by Editor/Admin/Owner users by directly accessing the edit URL with the content UUID.

PoC

  • User A: Editor role (example username: dummy04)
  • User B: Visitor role (example username: dummy01)

Reproduction Steps:

Step 1 - Create draft as Editor:

  1. Login as User A (Editor role)
  2. Navigate to: http://localhost:4321/dashboard/content-management
  3. Create new content (it will stay as draft)
  4. After saving, note the UUID in the URL:
   http://localhost:4321/dashboard/content-management/edit?edit=bad87630-69a4-4cd6-bcb2-6965839dc148

Copy this UUID: bad87630-69a4-4cd6-bcb2-6965839dc148

Step 2 - Access draft as Visitor:

  1. Login as Visitor and get auth_session cookie
curl -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:4321/studiocms_api/auth/login" -F 'username=dummy01' -F 'password=dummy01pass$'
<img width="1128" height="376" alt="01" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/86c5290e-e7a2-470e-bbf5-5f5247eddec1" />
  1. Proof of Visitor permission

    <img width="1899" height="450" alt="02" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aabd47d3-163f-4a56-8296-08bd40c5ccdc" />
  2. Access Editor's draft using the UUID

curl "http://127.0.0.1:4321/dashboard/content-management/edit?edit=bad87630-69a4-4cd6-bcb2-6965839dc148" -H "Cookie: auth_session=qvawh6zv23hc2spu6xx7pzgrnn4rpd3q" -v

Result: Returns full HTML page with draft content (200 OK)

Impact

Impact Scenarios:

  1. Information Disclosure:

    • Visitor users can read unpublished drafts containing sensitive information
    • Drafts may contain confidential business information, unreleased announcements, or proprietary content
    • Competitive intelligence could be gathered from draft content
  2. Privacy Violation:

    • Personal notes, work-in-progress content, or internal communications in drafts exposed
    • Violation of content creator privacy expectations
  3. Business Impact:

    • Premature disclosure of marketing campaigns, product launches, or announcements
    • Loss of competitive advantage if draft strategies are exposed
    • Potential compliance issues if drafts contain regulated information
  4. Complete RBAC Bypass:

    • The entire role-based access control system for draft content is bypassed
    • "Visitor" role becomes equivalent to "Editor" for read access to drafts
    • Undermines the trust model of multi-user content management

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmstudiocmsall versions0.2.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for studiocms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update studiocms to 0.2.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-8cw6-53m5-4932 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-8cw6-53m5-4932 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-8cw6-53m5-4932. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary StudioCMS contains a Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the Content Management feature that allows users with the "Visitor" role to access draft content created by Editor/Admin/Owner users. ### Details **The Issue:** The endpoint `/dashboard/content-management/edit?edit={UUID}` validates user authentication but does NOT validate: 1. User role (should require Editor/Admin/Owner) 2. Content ownership (should verify the draft belongs to the user) This allows users with "Visitor" role (lowest privilege) to access draft content created by Editor/Admin/Owner user
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-8cw6-53m5-4932 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-8cw6-53m5-4932 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.