CVE-2026-32638 is a low-severity (CVSS 2.7) CWE-639 vulnerability in studiocms. A fix is available for studiocms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
StudioCMS REST getUsers Exposes Owner Account Records to Admin Tokens
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-32638.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
studiocmsnpmDescription
Summary
The REST API getUsers endpoint in StudioCMS uses the attacker-controlled rank query parameter to decide whether owner accounts should be filtered from the result set. As a result, an admin token can request rank=owner and receive owner account records, including IDs, usernames, display names, and email addresses, even though the adjacent getUser endpoint correctly blocks admins from viewing owner users. This is an authorization inconsistency inside the same user-management surface.
Details
Vulnerable Code Path
File: D:/bugcrowd/studiocms/repo/packages/studiocms/frontend/pages/studiocms_api/_handlers/rest-api/v1/secure.ts, lines 1605-1647
.handle(
'getUsers',
Effect.fn(
function* ({ urlParams: { name, rank, username } }) {
if (!restAPIEnabled) {
return yield* new RestAPIError({ error: 'Endpoint not found' });
}
const [sdk, user] = yield* Effect.all([SDKCore, CurrentRestAPIUser]);
if (user.rank !== 'owner' && user.rank !== 'admin') {
return yield* new RestAPIError({ error: 'Unauthorized' });
}
const allUsers = yield* sdk.GET.users.all();
let data = allUsers.map(...);
if (rank !== 'owner') {
data = data.filter((user) => user.rank !== 'owner');
}
if (rank) {
data = data.filter((user) => user.rank === rank);
}
return data;
},
The rank variable in if (rank !== 'owner') is the request query parameter, not the caller's privilege level. An admin can therefore pass rank=owner, skip the owner-filtering branch, and then have the second if (rank) branch return only owner accounts.
Adjacent Endpoint Shows Intended Security Boundary
File: D:/bugcrowd/studiocms/repo/packages/studiocms/frontend/pages/studiocms_api/_handlers/rest-api/v1/secure.ts, lines 1650-1710
const existingUserRankIndex = availablePermissionRanks.indexOf(existingUserRank);
const loggedInUserRankIndex = availablePermissionRanks.indexOf(user.rank);
if (loggedInUserRankIndex <= existingUserRankIndex) {
return yield* new RestAPIError({
error: 'Unauthorized to view user with higher rank',
});
}
getUser correctly blocks an admin from viewing an owner record. getUsers bypasses that boundary for bulk enumeration.
Sensitive Fields Returned
The getUsers response includes:
idemailnameusernamerank- timestamps and profile URL/avatar fields when present
This is enough to enumerate all owner accounts and target them for phishing, social engineering, or follow-on attacks against out-of-band workflows.
PoC
HTTP PoC
Use any admin-level REST API token:
curl -X GET 'http://localhost:4321/studiocms_api/rest/v1/secure/users?rank=owner' \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer <admin-api-token>'
Expected behavior:
- owner records should be excluded for admin callers, consistent with
getUser
Actual behavior:
- the response contains owner user objects, including email addresses and user IDs
Local Validation of the Exact Handler Logic
I validated the filtering logic locally with the same conditions used by getUsers and getUser.
Observed output:
{
"admin_getUsers_rank_owner": [
{
"email": "[email protected]",
"id": "owner-1",
"name": "Site Owner",
"rank": "owner",
"username": "owner1"
}
],
"admin_getUser_owner": "Unauthorized to view user with higher rank"
}
This demonstrates the authorization mismatch clearly:
- bulk listing with
rank=ownerexposes owner records - direct access to a single owner record is denied
Impact
- Owner Account Enumeration: Admin tokens can recover owner user IDs, usernames, display names, and email addresses.
- Authorization Boundary Bypass: The REST collection endpoint bypasses the stricter per-record rank check already implemented by
getUser. - Chaining Value: Exposed owner contact data can support phishing, account-targeting, and admin-to-owner pivot attempts in deployments that treat owner identities as higher-trust principals.
Recommended Fix
Apply rank filtering based on the caller's role, not on the request query parameter, and reuse the same privilege rule as getUser.
Example fix:
const loggedInUserRankIndex = availablePermissionRanks.indexOf(user.rank);
data = data.filter((candidate) => {
const candidateRankIndex = availablePermissionRanks.indexOf(candidate.rank);
return loggedInUserRankIndex > candidateRankIndex;
});
if (rank) {
data = data.filter((candidate) => candidate.rank === rank);
}
At minimum, replace:
if (rank !== 'owner') {
data = data.filter((user) => user.rank !== 'owner');
}
with a check tied to user.rank rather than the query parameter.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | studiocms | all versions | 0.4.4npm install studiocms@0.4.4 |
Affected Products
studiocmsstudiocmsDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for studiocms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update studiocms to 0.4.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-32638 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-32638 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.