Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Maven
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq

MEDIUMFix: jenkinsci/mailer-plugin@5e6051f

GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in org.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailer. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Cross-Site Request Forgery in Jenkins Mailer Plugin

Also known asCVE-2022-20613
Published
Jan 13, 2022
Updated
Feb 16, 2024
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Feb 16, 2024 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
org.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailerorg.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailer

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Jenkins Mailer Plugin prior to 408.vd726a_1130320 and 1.34.2 does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation.

This allows attackers with Overall/Read access to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname.

Additionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

Mailer Plugin 408.vd726a_1130320 and 1.34.2 require POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected form validation method.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
Mavenorg.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailer391.ve4a38c1bcf4b&&< 408.vd726a408.vd726a
Mavenorg.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailerall versions1.34.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailer. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update org.jenkins-ci.plugins:mailer to 408.vd726a or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Jenkins Mailer Plugin prior to 408.vd726a_1130320 and 1.34.2 does not perform a permission check in a method implementing form validation. This allows attackers with Overall/Read access to use the DNS used by the Jenkins instance to resolve an attacker-specified hostname. Additionally, this form validation method does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. Mailer Plugin 408.vd726a_1130320 and 1.34.2 require POST requests and Overall/Administer permission for the affected form validation method.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-85rq-hp8x-ghjq: Cross-Site Request… | O3 Security