Reposilite vulnerable to path traversal while serving javadoc expanded files (arbitrary file read) (`GHSL-2024-074`)GHSA-82j3-hf72-7x93
HIGHFix: dzikoysk/reposilite@e172ae4GHSA-82j3-hf72-7x93 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) Path Traversal vulnerability in com.reposilite:reposilite-backend. A fix is available for com.reposilite:reposilite-backend — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-82j3-hf72-7x93.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
com.reposilite:reposilite-backendReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Reposilite v3.5.10 is affected by an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability via path traversal while serving expanded javadoc files.
Details
The problem lies in the way how the expanded javadoc files are served. The GET /javadoc/{repository}/<gav>/raw/<resource> route uses the <resource> path parameter to find the file in the javadocUnpackPath directory and returns it's content to the user.
fun findRawJavadocResource(request: JavadocRawRequest): Result<JavadocRawResponse, ErrorResponse> =
with (request) {
mavenFacade.canAccessResource(accessToken, repository, gav)
.flatMap { javadocContainerService.loadContainer(accessToken, repository, gav) }
.filter({ Files.exists(it.javadocUnpackPath.resolve(resource.toString())) }, { notFound("Resource $resource not found") })
.map {
JavadocRawResponse(
contentType = supportedExtensions[resource.getExtension()] ?: ContentType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM,
content = Files.newInputStream(it.javadocUnpackPath.resolve(resource.toString()))
)
}
}
In this case, the <resource> path parameter can contain path traversal characters such as /../../. Since the path is concatenated with the main directory, it opens the possibility to read files outside the javadocUnpackPath directory.
Impact
This issue may lead to Arbitrary File Read on the server. A potential attacker can read some sensitive file, such as reposilite.db, that contains the sqlite database used by Reposilite. This database contains the sensitive information used by Reposilite, including passwords and hashes of issued tokens. Also, the configuration.cdn file can be read, which contains other sensitive properties.
Steps to reproduce
- Start the Reposilite instance on http://localhost:8080/
- Find at least one javadoc file in the hosted repositories. For example, the default test workspace contains the
/releases/javadoc/1.0.0/javadoc-1.0.0-javadoc.jararchive that is suitable for our attack. - Send a GET request to http://127.0.0.1:8080/javadoc/releases/javadoc/1.0.0/raw/%2e%2e%5c%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2freposilite.db
When this request is processed on the server, Reposilite tries to unpack the
/repositories/releases/javadoc/1.0.0/javadoc-1.0.0-javadoc.jarfile into the/javadocs/releases/javadoc/1.0.0/.cache/unpackfolder. Then, it tries to read the../../../../../../reposilite.dbfile from this folder, which triggers the path traversal attack.
Remediation
Normalize (remove all occurrences of /../) the <resource> path parameter before using it when reading the file. For example:
content = Files.newInputStream(it.javadocUnpackPath.resolve(resource.toPath()))
Changing resource.toString() to resource.toPath() is enough here as the com.reposilite.storage.api.Location#toPath method normalizes the string internally.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | com.reposilite:reposilite-backend | ≥ 3.3.0&&< 3.5.12 | 3.5.12com.reposilite:reposilite-backend:3.5.12 |
Affected Products
reposilitereposiliteDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for com.reposilite:reposilite-backend, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update com.reposilite:reposilite-backend to 3.5.12 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-82j3-hf72-7x93 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
How to detect GHSA-82j3-hf72-7x93
A community-maintained Nuclei template exists for this CVE. You can scan for it directly:
nuclei -id ghsa-82j3-hf72-7x93 -u https://target- Template
- Reposilite >= 3.3.0, < 3.5.12 - Arbitrary File Read
- Severity
- high
- Impact
- Unauthenticated attackers can exploit path traversal to read arbitrary files including the reposilite.db database file.
- Remediation
- Update Reposilite to version 3.5.12 or later.
Template by ProjectDiscovery nuclei-templates (iamnoooob, rootxharsh, pdresearch), MIT licensed. View the full template. Scan only systems you are authorised to test.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-82j3-hf72-7x93 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.