Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-7r87-cj48-wj45

MEDIUM

Potential Captcha Validate Bypass in flask-session-captcha

Also known asCVE-2022-24880PYSEC-2022-193
Published
Apr 26, 2022
Updated
Feb 21, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk62th percentile+0.88%
0.00%0.54%1.08%1.63%0.3%1.1%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍flask-session-captcha

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

flask-session-captcha is a package which allows users to extend Flask by adding an image based captcha stored in a server side session.

The captcha.validate() function would return None if passed no value (e.g. by submitting a request with an empty form).

If implementing users were checking the return value to be False, the captcha verification check could be bypassed.

Sample vulnerable code:

if captcha.validate() == False:
    ... # abort
else:
   ... # do stuff

Patches

A new version (1.2.1) is available that fixes the issue.

Workarounds

Users can workaround the issue by not explicitly checking that the value is False.

Checking the return value less explicitly should still work.

if not captcha.validate():
    ... # abort
else:
   ... # do stuff
if captcha.validate():
    ... # do stuff
else:
   ... # abort

References

https://github.com/Tethik/flask-session-captcha/pull/27

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIflask-session-captchaall versions1.2.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flask-session-captcha. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update flask-session-captcha to 1.2.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-7r87-cj48-wj45 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-7r87-cj48-wj45 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-7r87-cj48-wj45. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact flask-session-captcha is a package which allows users to extend Flask by adding an image based captcha stored in a server side session. The `captcha.validate()` function would return `None` if passed no value (e.g. by submitting a request with an empty form). If implementing users were checking the return value to be **False**, the captcha verification check could be bypassed. Sample vulnerable code: ```python if captcha.validate() == False: ... # abort else: ... # do stuff ``` ### Patches A new version (1.2.1) is available that fixes the issue. ### Workarounds Users can
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-7r87-cj48-wj45 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-7r87-cj48-wj45 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.