Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 tornado

MEDIUMFix: tornadoweb/tornado@24a2d96

GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-159 vulnerability in tornado. A fix is available for tornado — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Tornado has incomplete validation of cookie attributes

Also known asCVE-2026-35536GHSA-fqwm-6jpj-5wxcPYSEC-2026-2287
Published
Mar 11, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs15th percentile — riskier than 15% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍tornado

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Values passed to the domain, path, and samesite arguments of RequestHandler.set_cookie were not completely validated in versions of Tornado prior to 6.5.5. In particular, semicolons would be allowed, which could be used to inject attacker-controlled values for other cookie attributes.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItornadoall versions6.5.5pip install --upgrade 'tornado==6.5.5'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tornado, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update tornado to 6.5.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10python-tornado-0:6.5.5-1.el10_1.1RHSA-2026:13641
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10python-tornado-0:6.5.5-1.el10_2RHSA-2026:19034
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Supportpython-tornado-0:6.4.2-1.el10_0.2RHSA-2026:20577
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Supportpython-tornado-0:4.2.1-5.el7_9.3RHSA-2026:24342
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9python-tornado-0:6.5.5-1.el9_7.1RHSA-2026:13670
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9python-tornado-0:6.5.5-1.el9_8RHSA-2026:19189
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutionspython-tornado-0:6.4.2-1.el9_2.2RHSA-2026:20573
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Supportpython-tornado-0:6.4.2-1.el9_4.2RHSA-2026:20810

Frequently Asked Questions

Values passed to the `domain`, `path`, and `samesite` arguments of `RequestHandler.set_cookie` were not completely validated in versions of Tornado prior to 6.5.5. In particular, semicolons would be allowed, which could be used to inject attacker-controlled values for other cookie attributes.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-78cv-mqj4-43f7: tornado (Medium 5.4) | O3 Security