GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m — rfc3161-client
Fix: trailofbits/rfc3161-client@724a184GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m is a CWE-347 vulnerability in rfc3161-client. A fix is available for rfc3161-client — see the affected versions and patch details below.
rfc3161-client has insufficient verification for timestamp response signatures
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
rfc3161-clientReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
rfc3161-client 1.0.2 and earlier contain a flaw in their timestamp response signature verification logic. In particular, it performs chain verification against the TSR's embedded certificates up to the trusted root(s), but fails to verify the TSR's own signature against the timestamping leaf certificates. Consequently, vulnerable versions perform insufficient signature validation to properly consider a TSR verified, as the attacker can introduce any TSR signature so long as the embedded leaf chains up to some root TSA.
Patches
Users should immediately upgrade to rfc3161-client 1.0.3 or later.
Workarounds
There is no workaround possible. Users should immediately upgrade to a fixed version.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | rfc3161-client | all versions | 1.0.3pip install --upgrade 'rfc3161-client==1.0.3' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rfc3161-client, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update rfc3161-client to 1.0.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-6qhv-4h7r-2g9m across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.