Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp

Fix: Neoteroi/BlackSheep@bd4ecb9

GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp is a CWE-113 vulnerability in blacksheep. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

BlackSheep's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection

Also known asCVE-2026-22779PYSEC-2026-1222
Published
Jan 14, 2026
Updated
Jul 7, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍blacksheep

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers. The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers.

Attack vector: Applications using user input in HTTP client requests (method, URL, headers).

Patches

Users who use the HTTP Client in BlackSheep should upgrade to 2.4.6.

Workarounds

If users handle headers from untrusted parties, they might reject values for header names and values that contain carriage returns.

References

https://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/CRLF_Injection

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIblacksheepall versions2.4.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for blacksheep. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update blacksheep to 2.4.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers. The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers. **Attack vector:** Applications using user input in HTTP client requests (method, URL, headers). ### Patches Users who use the HTTP Client in BlackShee
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp: BlackSheep's… | O3 Security