Cross-site scripting vulnerability found in answerdev/answerGHSA-65px-4cpf-697r
CRITICALFix: answerdev/answer@c3001deGHSA-65px-4cpf-697r is a critical-severity (CVSS 9) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in github.com/answerdev/answer. 1 public exploit or proof-of-concept reference is indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for github.com/answerdev/answer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-65px-4cpf-697r.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/answerdev/answerReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - Stored in GitHub repository answerdev/answer prior to 1.0.4.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/answerdev/answer | all versions | 1.0.4go get github.com/answerdev/answer@v1.0.4 |
Affected Products
answeranswerResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/answerdev/answer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/answerdev/answer to 1.0.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-65px-4cpf-697r is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-65px-4cpf-697r in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.