Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 zebra-network

HIGH

GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Reachable Assertion vulnerability in zebra-network. A fix is available for zebra-network — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Zebra Address Book Aborted by IPv4-Mapped Mempool Misbehavior Update

Also known asCVE-2026-52829
Published
Jul 2, 2026
Updated
Jul 2, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs37th percentile — riskier than 37% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,636 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🦀zebra-network🦀zebrad

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Am I affected

You are affected if:

  1. You run zebrad up to and including v4.4.1.
  2. Your node listens on the default [::] address on a Linux host (the standard deployment configuration — net.ipv6.bindv6only=0 is the default on all common Linux distributions).
  3. Your node is synced near the chain tip (the expected production state for any node participating in the network).

Summary

An address normalization mismatch between the handshake path and the mempool misbehavior path causes a deterministic assertion panic when a peer connects via IPv4 to a dual-stack IPv6 listener and then triggers a mempool misbehavior penalty.

The handshake path canonicalizes IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses to plain IPv4 when storing the peer in the address book via MetaAddr::new_connected. The mempool misbehavior path forwards the raw transient socket address (IPv4-mapped IPv6 form) when sending MetaAddrChange::UpdateMisbehavior to the address book. The address book looks up the canonical IPv4 entry but then asserts that the previous entry's address matches the change's address. The mismatch between the canonical IPv4 address and the raw IPv4-mapped IPv6 address triggers the assertion, and panic = "abort" terminates the process.

Details

On Linux with net.ipv6.bindv6only=0, an IPv4 connection accepted by a [::] listener is represented internally as an IPv4-mapped IPv6 socket address (e.g., ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8233). Zebra's canonical_peer_addr helper converts these to plain IPv4 (e.g., 127.0.0.1:8233).

The handshake path uses MetaAddr::new_connected, which canonicalizes the address before storing in the address book. However, inbound inventory registration uses connected_addr.get_transient_addr(), preserving the raw IPv4-mapped form. When the mempool later downloads an invalid transaction from this peer and generates a misbehavior penalty, the raw transient address is forwarded through the misbehavior channel to MetaAddrChange::UpdateMisbehavior, which does not canonicalize.

After the 30-second misbehavior batch flush, AddressBook::update retrieves the canonical IPv4 entry but MetaAddrChange::apply_to_meta_addr asserts that previous.addr == self.addr(), which fails because one is IPv4 and the other is IPv4-mapped IPv6.

The attacker needs only to complete a P2P handshake over IPv4 to a dual-stack listener and advertise an invalid mempool transaction (such as a coinbase transaction). The assertion fires after the 30-second misbehavior batch flush.

Patches

Patched in Zebra 4.5.0. The fix canonicalizes the address in the misbehavior update path via a new MetaAddr::new_misbehavior constructor that applies canonical_peer_addr before creating the UpdateMisbehavior change.

Workarounds

Configuring listen_addr to an IPv4-only address (e.g., 0.0.0.0:8233) avoids the IPv4-mapped IPv6 representation and prevents this specific assertion. Alternatively, setting net.ipv6.bindv6only=1 on Linux prevents dual-stack acceptance.

Impact

A remote unauthenticated peer can deterministically crash any synced Zebra node running the default Linux dual-stack configuration with a single invalid mempool transaction advertisement, followed by a 30-second wait. The attack requires no mining capability, no RPC access, no funds, and no special privileges. The crash can be repeated after each restart, causing persistent downtime. Linux dual-stack sockets and mempool activation are the default production state, not special preconditions.

Credit

Reported by @Haxatron.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iozebra-networkall versions7.0.0cargo update -p zebra-network --precise 7.0.0
🦀crates.iozebradall versions4.5.0cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.5.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zebra-network, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update zebra-network to 7.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your node listens on the default `[::]` address on a Linux host (the standard deployment configuration — `net.ipv6.bindv6only=0` is the default on all common Linux distributions). 3. Your node is synced near the chain tip (the expected production state for any node participating in the network). ### Summary An address normalization mismatch between the handshake path and the mempool misbehavior path causes a deterministic assertion panic when a peer connects via IPv4 to a dual-stack IPv6 listener an
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-63wg-wjjj-7cp8: zebra-network | O3 Security