CVE-2026-44500 — zebra-network
MEDIUMCVE-2026-44500 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-770 vulnerability in zebra-network. A fix is available for zebra-network — see the affected versions and patch details below.
ZEBRA: Allocation Amplification in Inbound Network Deserializers
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44500.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-44500 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 388,997 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
zebra-network🦀zebrad🦀zebra-chainReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
CVE-2026-44500: Allocation Amplification in Inbound Network Deserializers
Summary
Several inbound deserialization paths in Zebra allocated buffers sized against generic transport or block-size ceilings before the tighter protocol or consensus limits were enforced. An unauthenticated or post-handshake peer could therefore force the node to preallocate and parse for orders of magnitude more data than the protocol intended, across headers messages, equihash solutions in block headers, Sapling spend vectors in V5/V4 transactions, and coinbase script bytes in blocks.
Severity
Moderate - This is a Denial-of-Service Vulnerability that could allow a malicious peer to amplify per-message memory and parse cost on Zebra nodes, with effects amplified by multi-peer fan-in.
Each individual case is bounded by the 2 MiB transport ceiling or the block-size cap, so no single message causes unbounded allocation, but the cumulative gap between intended and actual limits is significant.
Affected Versions
All Zebra versions prior to 4.4.0.
Description
Zebra's network codec uses TrustedPreallocate and generic Vec deserialization to bound inbound message parsing. In several places the bound used at the deserializer was the generic transport or block-size ceiling rather than the tighter protocol or consensus rule that applies to the field, so allocation happened first and the real limit was only enforced afterwards. Four such cases were identified:
headersmessage receive cap.read_headers()deserialized theCountedHeadervector via the genericTrustedPreallocatepath, which allowed up to ~1,409 entries per message. The protocol ceilingMAX_FIND_BLOCK_HEADERS_RESULTS = 160was only used on the send side, giving an ~8.8x preallocation gap on receive. Reachable before the version handshake completes since the codec is installed on raw bytes.- Equihash solution length.
Solution::zcash_deserializedecoded the solution as a genericVec<u8>and only checked the exact consensus size (1344 bytes mainnet/testnet, 36 bytes regtest) afterwards inSolution::from_bytes. A single fixed-size header field could be inflated to nearly the full block-size ceiling before rejection. - Sapling spend vectors in coinbase transactions. V5
spend_prefixesand V4shielded_spendswere allocated generically with block-size-derived ceilings (~5,681 / ~5,208 entries) before the consensus rule that coinbase transactions have zero Sapling spends was enforced in the verifier. - Coinbase script bytes.
Input::zcash_deserialize()read the coinbase script as a genericVec<u8>up to the message-size cap before enforcing the consensus rule that coinbase scripts are between 2 and 100 bytes.
An attacker could exploit this by:
- Opening an inbound TCP connection (and, for the latter three cases, completing the version handshake).
- Sending one of: a
headersmessage with a CompactSize count up to ~1,409, ablockwhose header carries an inflated equihash CompactSize, atxdeclaring a coinbase input with a largenSpendsSapling, or ablockwith a coinbase input whose script length is near the message-size ceiling. - The deserializer allocates against the loose ceiling, parses, and only then rejects.
Impact
Denial of Service
- Attack Vector: Network.
- Effect: Amplified per-message allocation and parse cost on inbound peer messages, stackable across concurrent connections. The concrete effect will be influenced by how much memory Zebra has available.
- Scope: Any affected Zebra node.
Fixed Versions
This issue is fixed in Zebra 4.4.0.
Mitigation
Users should upgrade to Zebra 4.4.0 or later immediately.
There are no known workarounds for this issue. Immediate upgrade is the only way to remove the amplified allocation surface on inbound peer messages.
Credits
Zebra thanks @Zk-nd3r for finding and reporting the issues.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | zebra-network | all versions | 6.0.0cargo update -p zebra-network --precise 6.0.0 |
| 🦀crates.io | zebrad | all versions | 4.4.0cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.4.0 |
| 🦀crates.io | zebra-chain | all versions | 7.0.0cargo update -p zebra-chain --precise 7.0.0 |
Affected Products
zebra-chainzfndzebra-networkzfndzebradzfndDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zebra-network, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update zebra-network to 6.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44500 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Do not deserialise data from untrusted sources: where the format allows it, restrict deserialisation to an explicit allowlist of expected types, and prefer a data-only format (JSON, Protobuf) over one that can reconstruct arbitrary objects until you can upgrade.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-44500 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.