GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Path Traversal vulnerability in pymdown-extensions. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Regression in pymdownx.snippets reintroduces sibling-prefix path traversal bypass despite restrict_base_path
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 360,399 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
pymdown-extensionsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
pymdownx.snippets has a regression of the CVE-2023-32309 / GHSA-jh85-wwv9-24hv fix. With restrict_base_path: True (the default), the current filename.startswith(base) containment check does not enforce a directory boundary. As a result, a markdown snippet directive can read files from sibling paths that share the same prefix as base_path, such as docs vs docs_internal.
The regression was introduced in PR #2039 / commit 7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d, which replaced the original directory-identity check with a plain string-prefix comparison.
Details
The regression was introduced in commit 7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d (2023-05-15, #2039 "Fix regression of snippets nested deeply under specified base path"), which relaxed the original os.path.samefile(base, os.path.dirname(filename)) check to a plain startswith(base).
SnippetPreprocessor.get_snippet_path() in pymdownx/snippets.py:
if self.restrict_base_path:
filename = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(base, path))
# If the absolute path is no longer under the specified base path, reject the file
if not filename.startswith(base):
continue
base is os.path.abspath(b) and has no trailing separator. str.startswith(base) is True for any filename whose string representation begins with the same characters as base, regardless of whether those characters end at a directory boundary.
Concrete example:
base = "/x/docs"path = "../docs_secret/leak.txt"(inside the markdown snippet directive)os.path.join(base, path)→"/x/docs/../docs_secret/leak.txt"os.path.abspath(...)→"/x/docs_secret/leak.txt"filename.startswith(base)→True, because"/x/docs_secret/..."begins with the literal string"/x/docs".
All releases from 10.0.1 (2023-05-15) through 10.21.2 (current) are affected.
Impact
Arbitrary file read within the host the build runs on, bounded by the prefix match. With base_path = /x/docs the attacker can read files from any sibling directory whose path begins with the literal string /x/docs followed by any non-separator character — for example /x/docs_internal/, /x/docs.bak/, /x/docs2/.
The threat model is the same as the original CVE-2023-32309: markdown content processed by the snippets preprocessor in a build pipeline (typical scenario: an MkDocs documentation site built in CI from PR contributions or otherwise less-trusted markdown) can read files outside the configured base. CI builds that publish the generated HTML expose the read file to the public; CI builds with secrets on disk leak those secrets.
Reproduction
Minimal local PoC, non-destructive:
import os, shutil, tempfile, markdown
work = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="pmx_poc_")
try:
base = os.path.join(work, "docs")
sibling = os.path.join(work, "docs_secret")
os.makedirs(base)
os.makedirs(sibling)
with open(os.path.join(sibling, "leak.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR\n")
out = markdown.markdown(
'--8<-- "../docs_secret/leak.txt"\n',
extensions=["pymdownx.snippets"],
extension_configs={
"pymdownx.snippets": {
"base_path": [base],
"restrict_base_path": True,
"check_paths": True,
}
},
)
print(out) # -> <p>TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR</p>
finally:
shutil.rmtree(work)
Default restrict_base_path: True is sufficient — no non-default option is required.
Suggested fix
Minimal change — require the separator after the base prefix:
- if not filename.startswith(base):
+ # Append `os.sep` so a sibling directory whose name shares a prefix
+ # (e.g. `/x/docs` vs `/x/docs_evil`) cannot satisfy the check.
+ if not filename.startswith(base + os.sep):
continue
This preserves the original intent (allow snippets nested at any depth under base_path) while restoring the directory-boundary check. It does not affect the os.path.isdir(base) branch where base is a file (that branch still uses os.path.samefile).
Alternative: os.path.commonpath([base, filename]) == base is equivalent and slightly more idiomatic, though it raises ValueError on different drives on Windows and would need a try/except. The startswith(base + os.sep) fix is the smaller diff.
Note: this fix does not change behaviour for symlinks inside base_path. The existing implementation uses os.path.abspath (not os.path.realpath), so a symlink within base_path pointing outside is still followed. That is a separate concern — symlinks require write access to base_path, a much higher bar than the current bypass — and matches the behaviour the CVE-2023 fix established.
Regression test
A regression test class TestSnippetsSiblingPrefix was added in tests/test_extensions/test_snippets.py. It uses tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested as base_path and a new fixture directory tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt. It asserts that the markdown directive --8<-- "../nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt" raises SnippetMissingError.
- Without fix: test fails (
AssertionError: SnippetMissingError not raised, sibling file is silently read). - With fix: test passes.
Full suite: python -m pytest tests/ -q → 738 passed (737 baseline + 1 new regression test). No regressions.
Affected versions
>= 10.0.1, <= 10.21.2
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pymdown-extensions | ≥ 10.0.1&&< 10.21.3 | 10.21.3 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pymdown-extensions. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update pymdown-extensions to 10.21.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.