CVE-2026-46338 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Path Traversal vulnerability in pymdown-extensions. A fix is available for pymdown-extensions — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PyMdown Extensions: Regression in pymdownx.snippets reintroduces sibling-prefix path traversal bypass despite restrict_base_path
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-46338.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-46338 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 381,682 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
pymdown-extensionsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
pymdownx.snippets has a regression of the CVE-2023-32309 / GHSA-jh85-wwv9-24hv fix. With restrict_base_path: True (the default), the current filename.startswith(base) containment check does not enforce a directory boundary. As a result, a markdown snippet directive can read files from sibling paths that share the same prefix as base_path, such as docs vs docs_internal.
The regression was introduced in PR #2039 / commit 7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d, which replaced the original directory-identity check with a plain string-prefix comparison.
Details
The regression was introduced in commit 7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d (2023-05-15, #2039 "Fix regression of snippets nested deeply under specified base path"), which relaxed the original os.path.samefile(base, os.path.dirname(filename)) check to a plain startswith(base).
SnippetPreprocessor.get_snippet_path() in pymdownx/snippets.py:
if self.restrict_base_path:
filename = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(base, path))
# If the absolute path is no longer under the specified base path, reject the file
if not filename.startswith(base):
continue
base is os.path.abspath(b) and has no trailing separator. str.startswith(base) is True for any filename whose string representation begins with the same characters as base, regardless of whether those characters end at a directory boundary.
Concrete example:
base = "/x/docs"path = "../docs_secret/leak.txt"(inside the markdown snippet directive)os.path.join(base, path)→"/x/docs/../docs_secret/leak.txt"os.path.abspath(...)→"/x/docs_secret/leak.txt"filename.startswith(base)→True, because"/x/docs_secret/..."begins with the literal string"/x/docs".
All releases from 10.0.1 (2023-05-15) through 10.21.2 (current) are affected.
Impact
Arbitrary file read within the host the build runs on, bounded by the prefix match. With base_path = /x/docs the attacker can read files from any sibling directory whose path begins with the literal string /x/docs followed by any non-separator character — for example /x/docs_internal/, /x/docs.bak/, /x/docs2/.
The threat model is the same as the original CVE-2023-32309: markdown content processed by the snippets preprocessor in a build pipeline (typical scenario: an MkDocs documentation site built in CI from PR contributions or otherwise less-trusted markdown) can read files outside the configured base. CI builds that publish the generated HTML expose the read file to the public; CI builds with secrets on disk leak those secrets.
Reproduction
Minimal local PoC, non-destructive:
import os, shutil, tempfile, markdown
work = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="pmx_poc_")
try:
base = os.path.join(work, "docs")
sibling = os.path.join(work, "docs_secret")
os.makedirs(base)
os.makedirs(sibling)
with open(os.path.join(sibling, "leak.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR\n")
out = markdown.markdown(
'--8<-- "../docs_secret/leak.txt"\n',
extensions=["pymdownx.snippets"],
extension_configs={
"pymdownx.snippets": {
"base_path": [base],
"restrict_base_path": True,
"check_paths": True,
}
},
)
print(out) # -> <p>TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR</p>
finally:
shutil.rmtree(work)
Default restrict_base_path: True is sufficient — no non-default option is required.
Suggested fix
Minimal change — require the separator after the base prefix:
- if not filename.startswith(base):
+ # Append `os.sep` so a sibling directory whose name shares a prefix
+ # (e.g. `/x/docs` vs `/x/docs_evil`) cannot satisfy the check.
+ if not filename.startswith(base + os.sep):
continue
This preserves the original intent (allow snippets nested at any depth under base_path) while restoring the directory-boundary check. It does not affect the os.path.isdir(base) branch where base is a file (that branch still uses os.path.samefile).
Alternative: os.path.commonpath([base, filename]) == base is equivalent and slightly more idiomatic, though it raises ValueError on different drives on Windows and would need a try/except. The startswith(base + os.sep) fix is the smaller diff.
Note: this fix does not change behaviour for symlinks inside base_path. The existing implementation uses os.path.abspath (not os.path.realpath), so a symlink within base_path pointing outside is still followed. That is a separate concern — symlinks require write access to base_path, a much higher bar than the current bypass — and matches the behaviour the CVE-2023 fix established.
Regression test
A regression test class TestSnippetsSiblingPrefix was added in tests/test_extensions/test_snippets.py. It uses tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested as base_path and a new fixture directory tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt. It asserts that the markdown directive --8<-- "../nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt" raises SnippetMissingError.
- Without fix: test fails (
AssertionError: SnippetMissingError not raised, sibling file is silently read). - With fix: test passes.
Full suite: python -m pytest tests/ -q → 738 passed (737 baseline + 1 new regression test). No regressions.
Affected versions
>= 10.0.1, <= 10.21.2
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pymdown-extensions | ≥ 10.0.1&&< 10.21.3 | 10.21.3pip install --upgrade 'pymdown-extensions==10.21.3' |
Affected Products
pymdown extensionsfacelessuserDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pymdown-extensions, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pymdown-extensions to 10.21.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-46338 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Red Hat ships pymdown-extensions in several products as a bundled dependency. The vulnerability requires an attacker to control Markdown content processed by the pymdownx.snippets extension and for sibling directories with a matching path prefix to exist. While the vulnerable versions are present, the practical…
Ensure that untrusted Markdown content is not processed by the pymdownx.snippets extension. If the snippets feature is not required, it can be disabled in the MkDocs or Python-Markdown configuration.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-46338 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-46338 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.