GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr
HIGHGHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/udm. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Free5GC UDM has Improper Input Validation and Generation of Error Messages Containing Sensitive Information
Real-World Exposure
github.com/free5gc/udmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The free5GC UDM component fails to validate the supi path parameter in six GET handlers of the nudm-sdm (Subscriber Data Management) service. An unauthenticated attacker can inject control characters into the SUPI parameter, causing UDM to forward a malformed request to UDR and return a 500 Internal Server Error response that exposes internal infrastructure details.
Affected Package
- Ecosystem: Go
- Package:
github.com/free5gc/udm - Affected versions:
<= v1.4.2 - Patched versions: none yet
Details
The following handlers in internal/sbi/api_subscriberdatamanagement.go do not call validator.IsValidSupi() before passing the supi parameter to the processor:
HandleGetSmfSelectData—GET /:supi/smf-select-dataHandleGetSupi—GET /:supiHandleGetTraceData—GET /:supi/trace-dataHandleGetUeContextInSmfData—GET /:supi/ue-context-in-smf-dataHandleGetNssai—GET /:supi/nssaiHandleGetSmData—GET /:supi/sm-data
By contrast, HandleGetAmData in the same file correctly validates the supi parameter:
// HandleGetAmData — correctly validates (not vulnerable)
supi := c.Params.ByName("supi")
if !validator.IsValidSupi(supi) {
c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, problemDetail)
return
}
// HandleGetSmfSelectData — missing validation (vulnerable)
supi := c.Params.ByName("supi")
// ← no validator.IsValidSupi(supi) call
s.Processor().GetSmfSelectDataProcedure(c, supi, plmnID, supportedFeatures)
The malformed supi is passed to the processor which constructs a URL to forward the request to UDR. Go's net/url parser rejects the URL containing control characters and returns an error. UDM catches this error and responds with a 500 SYSTEM_FAILURE that includes the full internal UDR URL in the detail field.
This is a missed fix of CVE-2026-27642, which applied the same validator.IsValidSupi() check only to internal/sbi/api_ueauthentication.go (HandleConfirmAuth and HandleGenerateAuthData), leaving the SDM service handlers unpatched.
Proof of Concept
# Vulnerable — returns 500 with internal UDR URL exposed
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/smf-select-data"
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/nssai"
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/trace-data"
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/sm-data"
# Expected (vulnerable) response:
# HTTP 500
# {
# "title": "System failure",
# "status": 500,
# "detail": "parse \"http://udr.internal:80/nudr-dr/v2/subscription-data/imsi-22277\x00INJECTED//provisioned-data/smf-selection-subscription-data\": net/url: invalid control character in URL",
# "cause": "SYSTEM_FAILURE"
# }
# Protected endpoint (for comparison) — returns 400
curl "http://<UDM_HOST>/nudm-sdm/v2/imsi-22277%00INJECTED/am-data"
# HTTP 400
# {"title":"Malformed request syntax","status":400,"detail":"Supi is invalid","cause":"MANDATORY_IE_INCORRECT"}
Impact
An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted GET request to any of the six affected endpoints to obtain:
- Internal UDR hostname and port
- Full internal API path structure (
/nudr-dr/v2/subscription-data/...) - UDR API version
- Internal service naming convention
This information can be used to facilitate further attacks against the UDR or other internal 5G core components.
Recommended Fix
Add validator.IsValidSupi() to all six affected handlers, following the pattern already used in HandleGetAmData:
supi := c.Params.ByName("supi")
if !validator.IsValidSupi(supi) {
problemDetail := models.ProblemDetails{
Title: "Malformed request syntax",
Status: http.StatusBadRequest,
Detail: "Supi is invalid",
Cause: "MANDATORY_IE_INCORRECT",
}
c.Set(sbi.IN_PB_DETAILS_CTX_STR, http.StatusText(int(problemDetail.Status)))
c.JSON(int(problemDetail.Status), problemDetail)
return
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/free5gc/udm | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/free5gc/udm. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Remediation status
No patched version of github.com/free5gc/udm has shipped for GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-585v-hcgf-jhfr across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.