Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj

MEDIUMFix: smithyhq/sqladmin#1035

GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-862 vulnerability in sqladmin. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

SQLAdmin: Authorization Bypass on `ajax_lookup`

Also known asCVE-2026-46645PYSEC-2026-3073
Published
May 21, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs20th percentile — riskier than 20% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.26%0.52%0.78%0.3%0.3%0.3%Jul 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 360,781 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍sqladmin

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The ajax_lookup endpoint in application.py bypasses the is_accessible() access control check that all other endpoints enforce.

If a developer restricts model access by overriding is_accessible(), an authenticated user can still query that model's data through the ajax_lookup endpoint — silently bypassing the restriction.

Affected endpoint:

GET /{identity}/ajax/lookup?name=<field>&term=<query>

All other endpoints enforce both checks:

Endpoint@login_requiredis_accessible()
list
create
edit
delete
details
export
ajax_lookup (before fix)
ajax_lookup (after fix)

Note: before this fix, ajax_lookup also lacked the @login_required decorator — unauthenticated users could query it directly. That was addressed in #1035. This report covers the remaining gap: authenticated but unauthorized users.

Patches

Two changes were made to ajax_lookup:

  1. Replaced the hand-rolled authentication check added in #1035 with the standard @login_required decorator used by all other endpoints.
  2. Added the missing is_accessible(request) check, raising HTTP 403 when it returns False.

Workarounds

None. Developers relying on is_accessible() to restrict model visibility are exposed regardless of what other access controls are in place.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIsqladminall versions0.25.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sqladmin. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update sqladmin to 0.25.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The `ajax_lookup` endpoint in `application.py` bypasses the `is_accessible()` access control check that all other endpoints enforce. If a developer restricts model access by overriding `is_accessible()`, an authenticated user can still query that model's data through the `ajax_lookup` endpoint — silently bypassing the restriction. **Affected endpoint:** `GET /{identity}/ajax/lookup?name=<field>&term=<query>` **All other endpoints enforce both checks:** | Endpoint | `@login_required` | `is_accessible()` | |---|---|---| | `list` | ✓ | ✓ | | `create` | ✓ | ✓ | | `edit` | ✓ | ✓ |
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-54mc-gghv-4cfj: SQLAdmin:… | O3 Security