REXML denial of service vulnerabilityGHSA-4xqq-m2hx-25v8
MEDIUMGHSA-4xqq-m2hx-25v8 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in rexml. A fix is available for rexml — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4xqq-m2hx-25v8.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
rexmlReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The REXML gem before 3.3.1 has some DoS vulnerabilities when it parses an XML that has many specific characters such as <, 0 and %>.
If you need to parse untrusted XMLs, you may be impacted to these vulnerabilities.
Patches
The REXML gem 3.3.2 or later include the patches to fix these vulnerabilities.
Workarounds
Don't parse untrusted XMLs.
References
- https://github.com/ruby/rexml/security/advisories/GHSA-vg3r-rm7w-2xgh : This is a similar vulnerability
- https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2024/07/16/dos-rexml-cve-2024-39908/
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💎RubyGems | rexml | all versions | 3.3.2bundle update rexml --conservative |
Affected Products
bootstrap osnetapprexmlruby-langDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rexml, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update rexml to 3.3.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4xqq-m2hx-25v8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-4xqq-m2hx-25v8 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ruby:3.3-8100020240906074654.489197e6 | RHSA-2024:6784 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | ruby:3.1-8100020250407112943.489197e6 | RHSA-2025:4063 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ruby:3.3-9040020240906110954.9 | RHSA-2024:6785 |
| Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | ruby:3.1-9050020250404144903.9 | RHSA-2025:4488 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-4xqq-m2hx-25v8 in your dependencies?
Find it across RubyGems, including transitive dependencies.