Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💧
💧 Hex
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-34715 — ewe

MEDIUMFix: vshakitskiy/ewe@ce4ff21

CVE-2026-34715 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-113 vulnerability in ewe. A fix is available for ewe — see the affected versions and patch details below.

ewe Has Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (HTTP Request/Response Splitting)

Also known asGHSA-x2w3-23jr-hrpf
Published
Apr 2, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-34715.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-34715 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
💧ewe

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Hex packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The encode_headers function in src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam directly interpolates response header keys and values into raw HTTP bytes without validating or stripping CRLF (\r\n) sequences. An application that passes user-controlled data into response headers (e.g., setting a Location redirect header from a request parameter) allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP response content, leading to response splitting, cache poisoning, and possible cross-site scripting.

Notably, ewe does validate CRLF in incoming request headers via validate_field_value() in the HTTP/1.1 parser — but provides no equivalent protection for outgoing response headers in the encoder.

Details

File: src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam

Vulnerable code:

fn encode_headers(headers: List(#(String, String))) -> BitArray {
  let headers =
    list.fold(headers, <<>>, fn(acc, headers) {
      let #(key, value) = headers
      <<acc:bits, key:utf8, ": ", value:utf8, "\r\n">>
    })

  <<headers:bits, "\r\n">>
}

Both key and value are embedded directly into the BitArray output. If either contains \r\n, the resulting bytes become a structurally valid but attacker-controlled HTTP response, terminating the current header early and injecting new headers or a second HTTP response.

Contrast with request parsing (src/ewe/internal/http1.gleam): incoming header values are protected:

use value <- try(
  validate_field_value(value) |> replace_error(InvalidHeaders)
)

No analogous validation exists for outgoing header values in the encoder. The solution is to strip or reject \r (0x0D) and \n (0x0A) from all header key and value strings in encode_headers before encoding, mirroring the validation already applied to incoming request headers via validate_field_value()

PoC

An ewe application echoes a user-supplied redirect URL into a Location header:

fn handle_request(req: Request) -> Response {
  let redirect_url =
    request.get_query(req)
    |> result.try(list.key_find(_, "next"))
    |> result.unwrap("/home")

  response.new(302)
  |> response.set_header("location", redirect_url)
  |> response.set_body(ewe.Empty)
}

Attacker request:

printf 'GET /?next=https://example.com%%0d%%0aX-Injected:%%20true HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost\r\n\r\n' | nc -w 2 localhost 8080

Resulting response:

HTTP/1.1 302 Found
location: https://example.com
X-Injected: true
content-length: 0
date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:53:00 GMT
connection: keep-alive


The X-Injected: true header appears as a separate response header, confirming that CRLF sequences in user input are not sanitized by the encoder.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💧Hexeweall versions3.0.6mix deps.update ewe

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ewe, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ewe to 3.0.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-34715 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-34715 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-34715. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `encode_headers` function in `src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam` directly interpolates response header keys and values into raw HTTP bytes without validating or stripping CRLF (`\r\n`) sequences. An application that passes user-controlled data into response headers (e.g., setting a `Location` redirect header from a request parameter) allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP response content, leading to response splitting, cache poisoning, and possible cross-site scripting. Notably, ewe *does* validate CRLF in **incoming** request headers via `validate_field_value()` in the HT
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-34715 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-34715 across Hex dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-34715: ewe XSS (Medium 5.3) | O3 Security