Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-4v48-4q5m-8vx4

HIGH

Prometheus vulnerable to basic authentication bypass

Published
Dec 5, 2022
Updated
Apr 15, 2026
Affected
4 pkgs
Patched
4 / 4
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

4 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/prometheus/prometheus🐹github.com/prometheus/prometheus🐹github.com/prometheus/prometheus/v2🐹github.com/prometheus/prometheus/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Prometheus can be secured by a web.yml file that specifies usernames and hashed passwords for basic authentication.

Passwords are hashed with bcrypt, which means that even if you have access to the hash, it is very hard to find the original password back.

However, a flaw in the way this mechanism was implemented in the exporter toolkit makes it possible with people who know the hashed password to authenticate against Prometheus.

A request can be forged by an attacker to poison the internal cache used to cache the computation of hashes and make subsequent requests successful. This cache is used in both happy and unhappy scenarios in order to limit side channel attacks that could tell an attacker if a user is present in the file or not.

Patches

Prometheus 2.37.4 (LTS) and 2.40.4 have been released to address this issue.

Workarounds

There is no workaround but attacker must have access to the hashed password, stored in disk, to bypass the authentication.

Credit

We want to thank Lei Wan for reporting this security issue.

Affected Packages

4 total 4 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/prometheus/prometheus2.24.1&&< 2.37.42.37.4
🐹Gogithub.com/prometheus/prometheus2.38.0&&< 2.40.42.40.4
🐹Gogithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/v22.24.1&&< 2.37.42.37.4
🐹Gogithub.com/prometheus/prometheus/v22.38.0&&< 2.40.42.40.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/prometheus/prometheus. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/prometheus/prometheus to 2.37.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4v48-4q5m-8vx4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-4v48-4q5m-8vx4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-4v48-4q5m-8vx4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Prometheus can be secured by a web.yml file that specifies usernames and hashed passwords for basic authentication. Passwords are hashed with bcrypt, which means that even if you have access to the hash, it is very hard to find the original password back. However, a flaw in the way this mechanism was implemented in the [exporter toolkit](https://github.com/prometheus/exporter-toolkit) makes it possible with people who know the hashed password to authenticate against Prometheus. A request can be forged by an attacker to poison the internal cache used to cache the computation of h
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4v48-4q5m-8vx4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-4v48-4q5m-8vx4 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.