Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-4333-387x-w245

CRITICAL

GHSA-4333-387x-w245 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-4333-387x-w245 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

CI4MS: Blogs Tags Full Account Takeover for All-Roles & Privilege-Escalation via Stored DOM XSS

Also known asCVE-2026-34559
Published
Apr 1, 2026
Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Vulnerability: Stored DOM XSS via Blog Tag Name (Persistent Payload Injection)

  • Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Unsanitized Blog Tag Name in Blog Management

Description

The application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when creating or editing blog tags. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the tag name field, which is then stored server-side.

This stored payload is later rendered unsafely across public tag pages and administrative interfaces without proper output encoding, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS).

Affected Functionality

  • Blog tag creation functionality
  • Blog tag editing functionality
  • Blog tag storage and retrieval logic

Attack Scenario

  • An attacker creates or edits a blog tag name to include a malicious XSS payload.
  • The application stores this value without sanitization or encoding.
  • The payload persists and executes whenever the tag name is rendered in affected views.

Impact

  • Persistent Stored XSS
  • Execution of arbitrary JavaScript in victims’ browsers
  • Privilege escalation when viewed by administrators or privileged users
  • Full administrator account takeover
  • Full account takeover across all roles
  • Full compromise of the entire application

Endpoints:

  • /backend/blogs/tags/
  • /blog/{id}

Steps To Reproduce (POC)

  1. Go to the Blog Tags management page
  2. Create or edit a tag and insert an XSS payload into the tag name such as: <img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
  3. Save the tag
  4. View a public blog page or the administrative interface where the tag is rendered
  5. Notice the XSS payload executing automatically

Remediation

  • Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation methods: Do not use .html(), innerHTML, or similar sink functions in client-side JavaScript or server-side templating (e.g., PHP). Even when user input flowing into these sinks is not immediately apparent, they can introduce Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities that an attacker may exploit.

  • Apply output encoding: Implement HTML entity encoding on all user-controlled data before rendering it in the browser. This helps neutralize potentially malicious input.

  • Implement input sanitization: Ensure that all user-supplied input is properly sanitized before processing or output. Currently, no sanitization mechanisms are in place, which should be addressed as a priority.

  • Enforce security headers and cookie attributes:

    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Define and enforce a strict CSP to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts.
    • HttpOnly flag: Set the HttpOnly attribute on session cookies to prevent client-side script access.
    • SameSite attribute: Configure the SameSite cookie attribute to mitigate Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) risks.
    • Secure flag: Ensure all cookies are transmitted only over HTTPS by enabling the Secure attribute.

    These measures collectively reduce the impact of XSS and help prevent escalation paths such as CSRF via XSS.

Ready Video POC:

https://mega.nz/file/GI9Bnbha#FkVY4K7AiuttnBGDFaCtxuJwKk-afRcKjYJnkqfLZOM

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistci4-cms-erp/ci4msall versions0.31.0.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4333-387x-w245 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-4333-387x-w245 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-4333-387x-w245. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary ### **Vulnerability: Stored DOM XSS via Blog Tag Name (Persistent Payload Injection)** - Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Unsanitized Blog Tag Name in Blog Management ### Description The application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when creating or editing blog tags. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the tag name field, which is then stored server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely across public tag pages and administrative interfaces without proper output encoding, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). ### Affecte
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4333-387x-w245 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-4333-387x-w245 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.