GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-770 vulnerability in io.vertx:vertx-core. A fix is available for io.vertx:vertx-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Vert.x has a DoS via unbounded server-side SNI SslContext cache growth
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
io.vertx:vertx-core☕io.vertx:vertx-core☕io.vertx:vertx-core☕io.vertx:vertx-coreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Potential unbounded server-side SNI SslContext cache growth in Vert.x TLS handling, with = resource-exhaustion / DoS impact. On affected versions, matching server-side SNI names are cached via computeIfAbsent(serverName, ...) in a serverName-keyed SslContext cache.
The implementation differs slightly by branch, but the same sink appears to be present in released versions 4.3.4 through 5.0.11:
4.3.x:SSLHelper4.4.x/4.5.x:SslChannelProvider5.0.xand currentmaster:SslContextProvider
When server-side SNI is enabled and wildcard or otherwise broad hostname mappings are used, an unauthenticated client can send many distinct matching SNI names and cause the server to retain increasing numbers of SslContext entries over time, leading to increasing memory consumption and possible DoS conditions.
Steps to reproduce
- Configure a Vert.x server with
setSsl(true)andsetSni(true). - Use a keystore or mapping where many distinct SNI names match a wildcard or similarly broad rule.
- Send repeated connections with distinct matching SNI values.
- Observe that the SNI cache size grows with the number of unique matching names.
What are the affected versions?
Affected released versions confirmed on origin:
4.3.4through4.3.84.4.0through4.4.94.5.0through4.5.265.0.0through5.0.11
Not affected by the same sink:
4.0.xthrough4.2.x4.3.0through4.3.3
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | io.vertx:vertx-core | ≥ 4.3.4 | No fix |
| ☕Maven | io.vertx:vertx-core | ≥ 4.4.0 | No fix |
| ☕Maven | io.vertx:vertx-core | ≥ 4.5.0&&< 4.5.27 | 4.5.27io.vertx:vertx-core:4.5.27 |
| ☕Maven | io.vertx:vertx-core | ≥ 5.0.0&&< 5.0.12 | 5.0.12io.vertx:vertx-core:5.0.12 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.vertx:vertx-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
No patched version of io.vertx:vertx-core has shipped for GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This flaw is rated as Moderate because a remote attacker can trigger a denial of service in Red Hat products that use `eclipse-vertx/vert.x` and are configured with TLS wildcard server names. Exploitation occurs during the TLS handshake, impacting service availability without affecting data confidentiality or…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 | cryostat/cryostat-reports-rhel9:4.2.0-13 | RHSA-2026:48151 |
| Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.3 for Spring Boot 3.5.16 | vertx-core | RHSA-2026:54622 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle:26.4.13-1 | RHSA-2026:30050 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.13 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | RHSA-2026:30049 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 | rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle:26.6.4-2 | RHSA-2026:30084 |
| Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.4 | rhbk/keycloak-rhel9 | RHSA-2026:30083 |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.4.SP1 | vertx-core | RHSA-2026:26018 |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.2.SP1 | vertx-core | RHSA-2026:26017 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6 across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.