GHSA-37jf-mjv6-xfqw is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.9) Reachable Assertion vulnerability in tensorflow. A fix is available for tensorflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.
TensorFlow vulnerable to `CHECK` fail in `Conv2DBackpropInput`
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-37jf-mjv6-xfqw.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-37jf-mjv6-xfqw by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-gpu+1 moreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
When Conv2DBackpropInput receives empty out_backprop inputs (e.g. [3, 1, 0, 1]), the current CPU/GPU kernels CHECK fail (one with dnnl, the other with cudnn). This can be used to trigger a denial of service attack.
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
input_sizes = [3, 1, 1, 2]
filter = np.ones([1, 3, 2, 3])
out_backprop = np.ones([3, 1, 0, 3])
strides = [1, 1, 2, 1]
padding = 'VALID'
tf.raw_ops.Conv2DBackpropInput(
input_sizes = input_sizes,
filter = filter,
out_backprop = out_backprop,
strides = strides,
padding = padding
)
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 27a65a43cf763897fecfa5cdb5cc653fc5dd0346.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.10.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.9.1, TensorFlow 2.8.1, and TensorFlow 2.7.2, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Jingyi Shi.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | all versions | 2.7.2pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.7.2' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.1 | 2.8.1pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.8.1' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.9.0&&< 2.9.1 | 2.9.1pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.9.1' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | all versions | 2.7.2pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow-cpu==2.7.2' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.1 | 2.8.1pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow-cpu==2.8.1' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.9.0&&< 2.9.1 | 2.9.1pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow-cpu==2.9.1' |
Affected Products
tensorflowgoogleDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update tensorflow to 2.7.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-37jf-mjv6-xfqw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-37jf-mjv6-xfqw in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.