GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw
Fix: craftcms/cms@e3f3eaaGHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw is a security vulnerability in craftcms/cms. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Craft CMS's Missing Volume Permission Check in AssetsController::actionShowInFolder Allows Information Disclosure
Real-World Exposure
craftcms/cmsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
AssetsController::actionShowInFolder() fetches an asset by ID and returns its filename and complete folder hierarchy (including volume handle, volume UID, folder names, folder UIDs, and folder URI paths) without checking whether the requesting user has viewAssets or viewPeerAssets permission on the asset’s volume. Any authenticated CP user — even one with zero volume permissions — can enumerate asset filenames and the full folder structure of any volume by supplying arbitrary asset IDs.
This follows the exact same incomplete-patch pattern as four GHSAs merged on 2026-02-25 (GHSA-x76w-8c62-48mg, GHSA-vgjg-248p-rfm2, GHSA-5pgf-h923-m958, GHSA-3pvf-vxrv-hh9c), all of which added requireVolumePermissionByAsset() + requirePeerVolumePermissionByAsset() to sibling AssetsController actions. The actionShowInFolder method was introduced thirteen days before the patch wave and was not included in it.
Details
The vulnerability is in src/controllers/AssetsController.php at line 1437. The method:
- Calls
requireCpRequest()— verifies the request targets the CP, enforcesaccessCppermission viaController::_enforceAllowAnonymous(), but does NOT enforce any volume-level permission. - Fetches any asset by ID with
Asset::findOne($assetId)— noeditable/savablescope filter, so all assets across all volumes are reachable. - Returns sensitive structural data via JSON.
Impact
- Any authenticated control panel user with only
accessCppermission can discover the filenames and complete folder structure (names, UIDs, handles, URIs) of assets in volumes they are not authorized to access. - Sensitive volume structures — private document repositories, confidential media, internal file names — are exposed to any user who can log into the control panel.
- This enables targeted follow-up attacks: an attacker who knows a private asset’s filename and folder path may have other avenues to exfiltrate the actual file.
Resources
https://github.com/craftcms/cms/commit/e3f3eaab3d85badd713cfc2c24e5f0792ecdb586
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | craftcms/cms | ≥ 5.0.0-RC1&&< 5.9.18 | 5.9.18 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for craftcms/cms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update craftcms/cms to 5.9.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-33m5-hqp9-97pw across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.