Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
💎
💎 RubyGems
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw — sinatra

HIGHFix: sinatra/sinatra@ea8fc94

GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) CWE-494 vulnerability in sinatra. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for sinatra — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Sinatra vulnerable to Reflected File Download attack

Also known asCVE-2022-45442
Published
Nov 30, 2022
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs50th percentile — riskier than 50% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
💎sinatra💎sinatra

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects RubyGems packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Description

An issue was discovered in Sinatra 2.0 before 2.2.3 and 3.0 before 3.0.4. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a response when the filename is derived from user-supplied input.

References

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
💎RubyGemssinatra≥ 3.0&&< 3.0.43.0.4bundle update sinatra --conservative
💎RubyGemssinatra≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.2.32.2.3bundle update sinatra --conservative
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sinatra, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update sinatra to 3.0.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8pcs-0:0.10.14-5.el8_7.2RHSA-2023:0855
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.1 Update Services for SAP Solutionspcs-0:0.10.2-4.el8_1.3RHSA-2023:0857
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Telecommunications Update Servicepcs-0:0.10.4-6.el8_2.4RHSA-2023:0393
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.10.8-1.el8_4.3RHSA-2023:0506
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.10.12-6.el8_6.3RHSA-2023:0427
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9pcs-0:0.11.3-4.el9_1.2RHSA-2023:0974
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Extended Update Supportpcs-0:0.11.1-10.el9_0.3RHSA-2023:0527

Frequently Asked Questions

### Description An issue was discovered in Sinatra 2.0 before 2.2.3 and 3.0 before 3.0.4. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a response when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. ### References * https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-14/materials/eu-14-Hafif-Reflected-File-Download-A-New-Web-Attack-Vector.pdf * https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8x94-hmjh-97hq
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw across RubyGems dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw: sinatra (High 8.8) | O3 Security