Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-2q4j-m29v-hq73 — pypdf

Fix: py-pdf/pypdf#3610

GHSA-2q4j-m29v-hq73 is a CWE-835 vulnerability in pypdf. A fix is available for pypdf — see the affected versions and patch details below.

pypdf has possible Infinite Loop when processing outlines/bookmarks

Also known asCVE-2026-24688PYSEC-2026-1827
Published
Jan 26, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2q4j-m29v-hq73.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs37th percentile — riskier than 37% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍pypdf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires accessing the outlines/bookmarks.

Patches

This has been fixed in pypdf 6.6.2.

Workarounds

If projects cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #3610.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIpypdfall versions6.6.2pip install --upgrade 'pypdf==6.6.2'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
pypdfpypdf_project
< 6.6.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pypdf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update pypdf to 6.6.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2q4j-m29v-hq73 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-2q4j-m29v-hq73 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires accessing the outlines/bookmarks. ### Patches This has been fixed in [pypdf 6.6.2](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/releases/tag/6.6.2). ### Workarounds If projects cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR [#3610](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/pull/3610).
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2q4j-m29v-hq73 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.