CVE-2026-84311 — pypdf
Fix: py-pdf/pypdf@d91ab70CVE-2026-84311 is a CWE-834 vulnerability in pypdf. A fix is available for pypdf — see the affected versions and patch details below.
pypdf: Possible long runtimes/large memory usage when extracting XForm objects
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-84311.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
pypdfReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.16.1, an attacker can craft a PDF that causes pypdf/_page.py PageObject._extract_text and PageObject.extract_xform_text to traverse a directed acyclic graph of reused form XObjects in which each form invokes a child multiple times, creating exponentially many traversal paths and causing long runtimes and large memory consumption. This issue is fixed in version 6.16.1.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pypdf | all versions | 6.16.1pip install --upgrade 'pypdf==6.16.1' |
Affected Products
pypdfpypdf_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pypdf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update pypdf to 6.16.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-84311 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
A flaw was found in pypdf's text extraction logic (_extract_text and extract_xform_text) within PageObject. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could trick a user or automated system into processing a specially crafted PDF containing a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of reused form XObjects. Invoking nested child forms…
Enforce application-level timeouts and memory limits on worker processes that execute PDF text extraction. Alternatively, avoid calling `PageObject.extract_text()` or `PageObject.extract_xform_text()` on untrusted PDF documents.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-84311 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-84311 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.