GHSA-2p9q-h29j-3f5v
MEDIUMMissing validation causes `TensorSummaryV2` to crash
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-gpu+1 moreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The implementation of tf.raw_ops.TensorSummaryV2 does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack:
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.TensorSummaryV2(
tag=np.array('test'),
tensor=np.array(3),
serialized_summary_metadata=tf.io.encode_base64(np.empty((0))))
The code assumes axis is a scalar but there is no validation for this.
const Tensor& serialized_summary_metadata_tensor = c->input(2);
// ...
ParseFromTString(serialized_summary_metadata_tensor.scalar<tstring>()(),
v->mutable_metadata());
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 290bb05c80c327ed74fae1d089f1001b1e2a4ef7.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University and Hong Jin from Singapore Management University.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | all versions | 2.6.4 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.7.0&&< 2.7.2 | 2.7.2 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | all versions | 2.6.4 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.7.0&&< 2.7.2 | 2.7.2 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update tensorflow to 2.6.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2p9q-h29j-3f5v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-2p9q-h29j-3f5v is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-2p9q-h29j-3f5v. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-2p9q-h29j-3f5v in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-2p9q-h29j-3f5v across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.